Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Assessment01:29

Nursing Assessment

9.8K
The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2022
Same author

Metabolic activity of the left and right atria are differentially altered in patients with atrial fibrillation and LV dysfunction.

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology·2022
Same author

Comparative efficacy and safety of antihyperglycemic drug classes for patients with type 2 diabetes following failure with metformin monotherapy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews·2021
Same author

Composite outcomes at OMERACT: Multi-outcome domains and composite outcome domains.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2021
Same author

Integrating sex and gender in studies of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.

ESC heart failure·2021
Same author

NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K

The OMERACT First-time Participant ("Newbie") Program: Initial Assessment and Lessons Learned.

Victor S Sloan1,2, Shawna Grosskleg1,2, Christoph Pohl1,2

  • 1From Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; UCB Biosciences Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; OMERACT, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine II Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology, Physical Therapy, and Sports Medicine, Schlosspark-Klinik, Teaching Hospital of the Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Ottawa Heart Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

The Journal of Rheumatology
|June 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Newbie training at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meeting significantly improved participant comfort with OMERACT sessions and filters. New attendees felt more welcome and able to contribute to the OMERACT process.

Keywords:
FILTEROMERACTOUTCOME MEASURESPARTICIPANT EXPERIENCETRAINING SESSION

More Related Videos

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.7K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.9K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

8.7K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Patient Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) meeting is a key forum for developing and validating outcome measures in rheumatology.
  • First-time participants, or "newbies," may face a steep learning curve regarding OMERACT's structure, methodology, and filters.
  • A structured training program can facilitate the integration and engagement of new attendees.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a dedicated training program for first-time participants at the OMERACT 12 meeting.
  • To assess the impact of the training on participants' understanding and comfort with OMERACT principles and meeting structure.
  • To determine if the training enhanced new attendees' sense of belonging and ability to contribute.

Main Methods:

  • A "newbie" training program was implemented at OMERACT 12, featuring an initial 2-hour session and subsequent 1-hour follow-up sessions.
  • Pre- and post-training surveys were administered to assess comfort levels with OMERACT sessions, OMERACT Filters 1.0 and 2.0, and overall meeting experience.
  • Participant feedback on feeling welcome and their perceived ability to contribute to breakout sessions was collected.

Main Results:

  • 25 new attendees participated in the introductory session, with 10-16 attending follow-up sessions.
  • A significant reduction in participant discomfort was observed post-training regarding OMERACT sessions (56% pre vs. 0-8% post) and OMERACT filters (64% pre vs. 0-8% post).
  • 100% of participants reported feeling welcome, and 87% felt they could contribute substantively to breakout sessions, with these positive outcomes sustained throughout the meeting.

Conclusions:

  • The newbie training program at OMERACT 12 successfully enhanced first-time participants' comfort with the meeting's structure and methodology.
  • The training empowered new attendees, increasing their confidence in contributing to the OMERACT process.
  • This initiative demonstrates the value of targeted support for integrating new members into complex scientific meetings.