Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 22, 2015
Differences in perceptual latency estimated from judgments of temporal order, simultaneity and duration are
Daniel Linares1, Alex O Holcombe2
1Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;
Abstract:
Differences in perceptual latency (ΔL) for two stimuli, such as an auditory and a visual stimulus, can be estimated from temporal order judgments (TOJ) and simultaneity judgments (SJ), but previous research has found evidence that ΔL estimated from these tasks do not coincide. Here, using an auditory and a visual stimulus we confirmed this and further show that ΔL as estimated from duration judgments also does not coincide with ΔL estimated from TOJ or SJ. These inconsistencies suggest that each judgment is subject to different processes that bias ΔL in different ways: TOJ might be affected by sensory interactions, a bias associated with the method of single stimuli and an order difficulty bias; SJ by sensory interactions and an asymmetrical criterion bias; duration judgments by an order duration bias.
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Subliminal Perception

