Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.8K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.8K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

1.8K
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
1.8K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

1.8K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.8K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Vision01:24

Vision

61.7K
Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.
61.7K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

1.0K
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Additivity of grouping by proximity and luminance similarity is dependent on relative grouping strength: An analysis of individual differences in grouping sensitivity.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

Contributions of low- and high-level contextual mechanisms to human face perception.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Same stimulus, same temporal context, different percept? Individual differences in hysteresis and adaptation when perceiving multistable dot lattices.

i-Perception·2022
Same author

Perception of the ambiguous motion quartet: A stimulus-observer interaction approach.

Journal of vision·2021
Same author

The Value of Bayesian Methods for Accurate and Efficient Neuropsychological Assessment.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2021
Same author

Combined frequency-tagging EEG and eye-tracking measures provide no support for the "excess mouth/diminished eye attention" hypothesis in autism.

Molecular autism·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.2K

Suppressive and enhancing effects in early visual cortex during illusory shape perception: A comment on.

Pieter Moors1

  • 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium;

I-Perception
|June 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Brain activity in early visual cortex was modulated by illusory shapes. Findings suggest predictive coding or neural adaptation may explain visual processing of Kanizsa figures.

Keywords:
illusory shape perceptionneural adaptationpredictive coding

More Related Videos

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K
The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.2K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K
The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

50.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Illusory shapes, like those in the Kanizsa stimulus, are perceived despite lacking physical contours.
  • Previous research suggests the brain actively constructs visual perception, potentially involving predictive mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of processing illusory shapes using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
  • To examine whether observed brain activity aligns with predictive coding models or alternative explanations like neural adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activity in the visual cortex.
  • Presented participants with Kanizsa illusory shape stimuli and nonillusory control stimuli.
  • Analyzed the spatial profile of BOLD activity in relation to the illusory shape and its inducing elements.

Main Results:

  • BOLD activity in early visual cortex was enhanced when activity profiles matched the illusory shape.
  • BOLD activity was suppressed when activity profiles matched the inducing elements.
  • These differential effects were interpreted within the framework of predictive coding or neural adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support predictive coding, where prediction errors (illusory shape) enhance activity and matches (inducers) suppress it.
  • An alternative explanation suggests neural adaptation to stable input from inducers may cause suppression.
  • The study highlights the complex interplay between top-down predictions and bottom-up sensory input in visual perception.