Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

832
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
832
Planning Nursing Care I01:21

Planning Nursing Care I

5.5K
The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...
5.5K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Exploring eye-hand coordination in central field loss with virtual reality.

Research square·2026
Same author

Cue combination for depth perception in macular degeneration: Motion parallax augments disparity.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The best stereoacuity is rarely at the fovea.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Vergence anomalies are associated with impaired stereopsis in amblyopia.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Oculomotor challenges in macular degeneration impact motion extrapolation.

Journal of vision·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.4K

Efficient saccade planning requires time and clear choices.

Saiedeh Ghahghaei1, Preeti Verghese1

  • 1Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore Street, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

Vision Research
|June 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Eye movement planning, or saccades, are more efficient when searchers prioritize informative locations. Deliberately planning saccades by increasing decision time improves search efficiency, especially in complex visual search tasks.

Keywords:
EfficiencyEye-movement planningSaccadesVisual search

More Related Videos

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

11.0K
Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.4K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

11.0K
Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception and eye movement control.
  • Cognitive psychology and decision-making.

Background:

  • Saccades, rapid eye movements, are crucial for information gathering.
  • Saccade efficiency is debated, particularly in complex visual search tasks with multiple targets and noise.
  • Previous research indicates saccades are efficient for single-target search but inefficient under time pressure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether altering visual noise levels or increasing saccadic latency improves the efficiency of eye movement planning in a multiple-target search paradigm.
  • To determine if observers preferentially select informative locations during visual search.
  • To explore the impact of stimulus discriminability and decision time on saccade efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a multiple-target visual search paradigm with stimuli at two levels of discriminability (varying noise).
  • Manipulated saccadic latency by delaying the initiation of the first eye movement.
  • Measured observer's saccade choices to assess preferential selection of informative locations.

Main Results:

  • Under low to moderate visibility conditions, most observers did not prioritize informative locations, looking at uncertain and probable target locations equally.
  • Increasing stimulus discriminability and saccadic latency led some observers to increase saccades to informative locations.
  • However, other observers prioritized speed, making rapid, unselective saccades regardless of informativeness.

Conclusions:

  • Efficient saccade selection, prioritizing informative locations, appears to require deliberate planning and sufficient decision time.
  • Increased saccadic latency is associated with a higher proportion of efficient saccades, suggesting planning is key.
  • Visual search efficiency is influenced by the interplay between stimulus properties, task demands, and the time available for decision-making.