Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Guided Endodontics: Three-Dimensional Planning and Template-Aided Preparation of Endodontic Access Cavities
Published on: May 24, 2022
The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized
Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi1, Laleh Mohammadian Bajgiran2, Amirali Naghdi2
1Department of Endodontics, Dental Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
The study found that ProTaper, RaCe, and Gates-Glidden drills can be safely used for coronal shaping in mandibular molars. All tested instruments maintained adequate minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) above 0.75 mm.
Area of Science:
- Endodontics
- Dental Anatomy
- Radiology
Background:
- Coronal preflaring is crucial for root canal preparation.
- The mesio-buccal (MB) canal in mandibular molars presents unique anatomical challenges.
- Ensuring adequate root thickness in the danger zone is vital to prevent perforation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) in the danger zone of mandibular first molar MB canals.
- To compare the effects of ProTaper, RaCe, and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers on MRRT using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Main Methods:
- CBCT scans were used to assess MRRT in 75 MB canals at 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm from the furcation.
- Samples were divided into three groups: ProTaper, RaCe, and GG drills.
- Canals were instrumented to a master apical file (MAF) of #25, with coronal shaping performed by the respective instruments.
Main Results:
- Gates-Glidden drills removed significantly more dentin than RaCe and ProTaper at specific sections.
- No statistically significant difference in MRRT was found between the ProTaper, RaCe, and GG groups.
- The mean MRRT remained above 0.75 mm in all sections across all tested groups.
Conclusions:
- ProTaper, RaCe, and Gates-Glidden drills can be safely employed as coronal shapers in MB canals of mandibular first molars.
- The choice of instrument for coronal shaping does not compromise the minimum residual root thickness when initial root thickness is adequate.
- These findings support the safe use of these instruments in endodontic procedures involving mandibular molars.
More Related Videos
03:07Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025