Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Trihybrid Crosses

Trihybrid Crosses

Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...

Incomplete Dominance

Incomplete Dominance

Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

Law of Segregation

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Erratum.

London journal of primary care·2018

Same journal

Hokusai: beyond the Great Wave.

London journal of primary care·2018

Same journal

One hundred years ago … there was a jigsaw puzzle of a farmer: teaching and learning with Kasimir Malevich.

London journal of primary care·2018

Same journal

Paving the way for the future of child and adolescent mental health in Japan.

London journal of primary care·2018

Same journal

Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in Oman.

London journal of primary care·2018

Same journal

Child and adolescent mental health service, Terengganu, Malaysia: how we are thinking about making a difference.

London journal of primary care·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

Published on: April 13, 2012

Banding in F2 general practice posts.

Yin Chi Shiba Poon¹, Peter Dennis Toon²

¹Fifth Year Medical Student, Queen Mary, University of London, UK.

London Journal of Primary Care

|June 5, 2015

Summary

Foundation Year 2 general practice posts offer educational value but cause financial hardship for junior doctors due to low pay. Adjustments to working hours could improve compensation and make these roles more attractive.

Keywords:

family practice foundation training income

More Related Videos

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity

Published on: April 13, 2012

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Application of DNA Fingerprinting using the D1S80 Locus in Lab Classes

Published on: July 17, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Junior Doctor Training
General Practice

Background:

Foundation Year 2 (FY2) general practice posts provide valuable clinical experience.
Junior doctors in these posts often face financial challenges.
Current payment structures may not adequately compensate for the demands of these roles.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the educational benefits of FY2 general practice placements.
To investigate the financial difficulties encountered by junior doctors in these posts.
To explore potential solutions for improving compensation and attractiveness of FY2 general practice training.

Main Methods:

Qualitative analysis of junior doctor experiences.
Review of current payment and banding systems.
Assessment of working hour and on-call requirements.

Main Results:

Significant educational advantages were identified in FY2 general practice posts.
Junior doctors reported substantial financial difficulties due to the absence of banding payments.
Low remuneration acts as a deterrent for selecting these training rotations.
Modifications to working hours and the unsociable nature of the posts could warrant higher banding payments.

Conclusions:

FY2 general practice posts are educationally beneficial but financially disadvantageous for junior doctors.
The current payment structure requires review to address financial disincentives.
Revising banding payments based on working conditions could enhance recruitment and retention in these essential training posts.