Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Monitoring GPCR-β-arrestin1/2 Interactions in Real Time Living Systems to Accelerate Drug Discovery
Published on: June 28, 2019
Biochemical characterization of smoothened receptor antagonists by binding kinetics against drug-resistant mutant
Yuji Shimizu1, Tsuyoshi Ishii1, Kazumasa Ogawa1
1Pharmaceutical Research Division, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, 26-1, Muraoka-higashi 2-chome, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 251-8555, Japan.
Abstract:
Hedgehog (Hh) signaling critical for development, differentiation, and cell growth is involved in several cancers, including medulloblastoma and basal cell carcinoma. Although antagonism of the smoothened receptor (SMO), which mediates Hh signaling, is an attractive therapeutic target, a drug-resistant mutation in SMO (SMO-D473H) was identified in a clinical trial of the approved drug vismodegib. TAK-441 potently inhibits SMO-D473H, unlike vismodegib and another SMO antagonist, cyclopamine, whereas the differences in binding modes between these antagonists remain unknown. Here we report the biochemical characterization of TAK-441, vismodegib, and cyclopamine by binding kinetics. The association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rates were determined by kinetic binding studies using [(3)H]TAK-441, and dissociation was confirmed by label-free affinity selection-mass spectrometry (AS-MS). In the [(3)H]TAK-441 competition assay, TAK-441 but not vismodegib and cyclopamine showed time-dependent inhibition. Quantitative kinetic binding analysis revealed that koff of TAK-441 was >10-fold smaller than those of vismodegib and cyclopamine. To further assess the binding mode of antagonists, kinetic binding analysis was performed against SMO-D473H. The D473H mutation affected koff of TAK-441 but not kon. In contrast, only kon was changed by the D473H mutation in the case of vismodegib and cyclopamine. These results suggest that the difference in antagonist efficacy against D473H is associated with the binding mode of antagonists. These findings provide a new insight into the drug action of SMO antagonists and help develop potential therapeutics for drug-resistant mutants.
More Related Videos
08:31Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...