Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

2.1K
Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares...
2.1K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

7.1K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
7.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

587
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
587

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalizing N-of-1 Trial Results to Facilitate Decision-Making.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias and outmigration of older Puerto Rican Medicare Fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2012-2019.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2026
Same author

Evidence for Evidence-Based Medicine - A Call for Some Theory and a New Problem.

NEJM evidence·2026
Same author

Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.

Experimental physiology·2026
Same author

Selected Impacts of Urban Heat Islands on Emergency Medical Services Utilization in Rhode Island.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model and Use of Home Dialysis and Kidney Transplant.

JAMA health forum·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.

Thomas A Trikalinos1,2, David C Hoaglin1,3,4, Kevin M Small5

  • 1Center for Evidence-based Medicine, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Research Synthesis Methods
|June 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces joint meta-analysis models for comparing multiple diagnostic tests simultaneously. These advanced models improve efficiency and accuracy when evaluating comparative test performance, particularly in paired designs.

Keywords:
Bayesian analysisjoint meta-analysismultinomial likelihoodmultivariate normalregularized regressionrestricted maximum likelihood

More Related Videos

A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
08:04

A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 13, 2014

12.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K
A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
08:04

A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 13, 2014

12.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

79.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Traditional meta-analysis methods often focus on single diagnostic tests.
  • Comparing multiple index tests within the same study population presents unique analytical challenges.
  • Existing approaches may not fully account for correlations between test results from the same participants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present novel models for the joint meta-analysis of multiple index tests applied to the same participants.
  • To address the within-study and between-study correlations inherent in paired diagnostic test accuracy studies.
  • To enhance the efficiency and precision of comparative diagnostic accuracy meta-analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed Bayesian models for joint meta-analysis of paired diagnostic test accuracy studies.
  • Accounted for within-study correlations of true-positive rates (TPRs) and false-positive rates (FPRs).
  • Incorporated between-study correlations for TPRs and FPRs, addressing threshold effects.

Main Results:

  • Joint and separate meta-analyses produced comparable estimates for TPR and FPR.
  • Joint meta-analysis demonstrated increased efficiency in calculating comparative accuracy.
  • Example: Summary TPR for shortened humerus was 35.3% (joint) vs. 37.9% (separate).

Conclusions:

  • Joint meta-analysis models offer a more efficient approach for comparative diagnostic accuracy studies.
  • The methodology effectively handles correlated test results within studies.
  • Further simulation and empirical validation are recommended to refine the application of these models.