Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis
Jennifer M Bell1, Michael D Shields1, Ashley Agus2
1Centre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Insights
The procalcitonin test is a more accurate and cost-effective tool for diagnosing Meningococcal Disease in children with fever. It improves diagnostic ability and is a superior biomarker, especially in infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- Health Economics
Background:
- Meningococcal Disease remains a concern in children despite vaccinations and advanced medical care.
- Fever without source in pediatric emergency departments necessitates accurate and efficient diagnostic tools.
- Evaluating novel biomarkers for early and reliable disease detection is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of the procalcitonin test as an adjunct for diagnosing prodromal Meningococcal Disease in febrile children.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of procalcitonin with standard tests (CRP and WBC count) in children presenting with fever without source.
- To determine the economic impact of incorporating procalcitonin testing into the diagnostic pathway.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines, identifying six independent studies.
- Analysis of data from 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.
- Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis to determine optimal cut-off values and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) for procalcitonin, CRP, and WBC count.
- Development of a decision analytic model comparing standard testing versus standard testing plus procalcitonin, from a National Health Service payer perspective.
Main Results:
- Procalcitonin demonstrated higher accuracy for early Meningococcal Disease detection (sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.74) compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, specificity=0.8).
- The decision analytic model indicated that procalcitonin testing was cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £-8,137.25 per correctly treated patient.
- Procalcitonin showed superior performance as a biomarker, particularly in infants.
Conclusions:
- Procalcitonin, when used with standard tests, enhances the ability to discriminate fatal cases of Meningococcal Disease.
- The procalcitonin test is a more cost-effective diagnostic strategy for children with fever without source.
- Further research into point-of-care procalcitonin testing and lifetime cost-effectiveness modeling (QALY) is recommended.
Background:
Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source.
Methods And Findings:
Data to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient.
Conclusions:
Procalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model.
More Related Videos
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Viral Meningitis
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...