Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Reconstructing 2 x 2 contingency tables from odds ratios using the Di Pietrantonj method: difficulties, constraints
Areti Angeliki Veroniki1, Marios Pavlides2, Nikolaos A Patsopoulos3,4,5
1Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.
Abstract:
A problem that is frequently encountered during the systematic review process is when studies that meet the inclusion criteria do not provide the appropriate numerical estimates to include in a meta-analysis. For dichotomous outcomes, a method has been suggested by Di Pietrantonj for reconstructing the 2 × 2 table when the Odds Ratio (OR), the Standard Error (SE(lnOR)) and the sample sizes are provided. The method produces two possible 2 × 2 tables; and to select the correct one, the Control Group Risk (CGR) is used. As CGR is typically unknown and only rounded figures of the OR and SE(lnOR) are provided, the accuracy of the reconstruction method varies. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of the method using simulated and empirical data. Small studies with large OR and CGR away from 50% are reconstructed satisfactorily, and the use of SE(lnOR) rounded to the third decimal rather than the second one improves the performance of the method. However, when CGR is unknown, its estimation from other studies is problematic as it exhibits high heterogeneity. Inclusion of an incorrectly reconstructed table in the meta-analysis may result in different summary effects. Reviewers that consider applying the method should be cautious about its impact in the meta-analysis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Related Concept Videos
Odds Ratio
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Contingency Table
Fisher's Exact Test
Determination of Expected Frequency
McNemar's Test

