Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran
1MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. daniel.jackson@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk
Abstract:
Statistical inference is problematic in the common situation in meta-analysis where the random effects model is fitted to just a handful of studies. In particular, the asymptotic theory of maximum likelihood provides a poor approximation, and Bayesian methods are sensitive to the prior specification. Hence, less efficient, but easily computed and exact, methods are an attractive alternative. Here, methodology is developed to compute exact confidence intervals for the between-study variance using generalised versions of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic. If some between-study is anticipated, but it is unclear how much, then a pragmatic approach is to use the reciprocals of the within-study standard errors as weights when computing the confidence interval.
Related Concept Videos
Cochran's Q Test
Test for Homogeneity
Confidence Intervals
A...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

