Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

3.2K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
3.2K
Perception01:28

Perception

1.8K
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
1.8K
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

1.2K
Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
1.2K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

58.9K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
58.9K
Subliminal Perception01:15

Subliminal Perception

1.0K
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
1.0K
Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)01:32

Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)

11.4K
Postsynaptic potential (PSP) refers to a change in the electrical potential of a neuron when neurotransmitters released by presynaptic neurons bind to postsynaptic receptors. This potential can either be excitatory, leading to depolarization and ultimately action potential generation, or inhibitory, leading to hyperpolarization and suppression of the postsynaptic neuron.
There are two types of receptors: ionotropic and metabotropic.
The ionotropic receptor is the membrane protein that has an...
11.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations between childhood behavior and current cognitive and emotional function in adults with irritable bowel syndrome-a cross sectional retrospective study.

BMC gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Victims of Conspiracies? An Examination of the Relationship Between Conspiracy Beliefs and Dispositional Individual Victimhood.

European journal of social psychology·2026
Same author

Neuroscience and climate action: intersecting pathways for brain and planetary health.

Current opinion in behavioral sciences·2026
Same author

Retrieving noncued episodic memories by taking a cascading walk down memory lane(s).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Shared effects of the opioid antagonist naltrexone on first-hand and empathic pain.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same author

Cognitive and affective empathy in binge drinking during late adolescence.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K

Size does matter! Perceptual stimulus properties affect event-related potentials during feedback processing.

Daniela M Pfabigan1, Uta Sailer2, Claus Lamm1

  • 1Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Unit, Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Psychophysiology
|June 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Stimulus size impacts neural feedback processing. Smaller feedback stimuli resulted in reduced amplitudes for feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P300 brain potentials, indicating less processing.

Keywords:
Early visual ERPsFRNP300Perceptual salienceStimulus size

More Related Videos

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

8.2K
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
11:39

Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding how physical stimulus properties influence neural feedback processing is crucial.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on the valence of feedback, with less attention paid to physical attributes like size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of feedback stimulus size on the neural correlates of feedback processing.
  • To determine if stimulus size influences event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with feedback evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A time estimation task was employed.
  • Participants received feedback in three different size categories: small, middle, and large.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record brain activity, focusing on early visual ERPs (P1, N1) and later feedback-related ERPs (FRN, P300).

Main Results:

  • Feedback stimulus size modulated later ERP components, including the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P300.
  • Small feedback stimuli led to diminished FRN and P300 amplitudes compared to middle and large stimuli.
  • Despite amplitude differences, the discrimination between negative and positive outcomes remained intact for both FRN and P300.
  • Time estimation performance was not affected by feedback stimulus size.

Conclusions:

  • Feedback stimulus size influences the salience and neural processing depth of feedback, particularly affecting FRN and P300 amplitudes.
  • Smaller feedback stimuli are perceived as less salient and processed less deeply.
  • Stimulus size offers a potential method for manipulating feedback salience in future research, especially for studies focusing on FRN and P300 variations.