Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Unusual Results01:16

Unusual Results

4.2K
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ  from the mean, μ  is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value =...
4.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

24.4K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
24.4K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

18.2K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.2K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

12.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[DNA informs on ancient partner choice].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same author

[TimeVaults provide recordings of past cellular activity].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same author

[In vivo CAR-Ts, a significant breakthrough].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same author

[House of cards?]

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same author

[Towards gene therapy for Hutington's disease].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2025
Same author

[DNA reveals the living world].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2025
Same journal

[CREPT: An ally of immunotherapy for the fight against non-small-cell lung cancers].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same journal

[A new regulatory mechanism of HIF-1α: the ROS-ATM-CHK2 axis at the core of tumor angiogenesis].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same journal

[Vibrio-host interactions: from the environmental niche to virulence].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same journal

[RcsF, hyperconnected sentinel of the bacterial envelope].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same journal

[Single-cell RNA-sequencing: shattering the clone myth].

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
Same journal

[No, Physarum blobs do not have 720 sexes!]

Medecine sciences : M/S·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K

[Utterly unanticipated findings].

Bertrand Jordan1

  • 1UMR 7268 ADÉS, Aix-Marseille, Université/EFS/CNRS, Espace éthique méditerranéen, hôpital d'adultes la Timone, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France - CoReBio PACA, case 901, parc scientifique de Luminy, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France

Medecine Sciences : M/S
|June 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can unexpectedly detect cancer in pregnant individuals. This necessitates careful patient communication and informed consent procedures for these incidental findings.

More Related Videos

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.8K
A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.8K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.8K
A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening tool used during pregnancy.
  • NIPT analyzes cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood.
  • Incidental detection of maternal malignancy is an emerging concern with NIPT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the implications of incidental cancer detection by NIPT.
  • To discuss challenges in patient communication and informed consent.
  • To review current practices and ethical considerations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of reported cases of NIPT detecting cancer.
  • Analysis of ethical guidelines for incidental findings.
  • Discussion of communication strategies.

Main Results:

  • Several cases demonstrate NIPT's potential to identify maternal cancer.
  • Challenges exist in conveying these complex results to patients.
  • Standard informed consent may not adequately cover these scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • NIPT can serve as an early cancer detection tool in pregnant women.
  • Clear protocols for managing and communicating incidental cancer findings are needed.
  • Informed consent processes must be updated to include potential maternal health risks.