Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 11, 2026

11:42
Combination of Microstereolithography and Electrospinning to Produce Membranes Equipped with Niches for Corneal Regeneration
Published on: September 12, 2014
13.0K
Real-world Experience With a Decellularized Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Allograft
Janice M Smiell1, Terry Treadwell2, Helen D Hahn3
1Alliqua Biomedical, Langhorne, PA;
Wounds : a Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice
|June 11, 2015
Summary
Decellularized, dehydrated human amniotic membrane (DDHAM) effectively supported wound closure in nearly 50% of chronic wounds within 8 weeks. This registry study confirmed DDHAM
Area of Science:
- Wound healing research
- Regenerative medicine
- Biomaterials in medicine
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often exclude over 50% of wound populations due to strict criteria, limiting real-world applicability.
- Generalizing RCT outcomes to diverse patient populations in wound care remains a challenge.
- Decellularized, dehydrated human amniotic membrane (DDHAM) is a potential therapeutic option for chronic wounds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes and clinical experience of using DDHAM in uninfected, full- or partial-thickness wounds.
- To observe the efficacy of DDHAM in a real-world setting with heterogeneous wound types and patient conditions.
- To assess the safety and benefit of DDHAM in supporting wound closure.
Main Methods:
- A registry study involving 15 sites and practicing wound care clinicians.
- Inclusion of 179 chronic wounds (venous, diabetic, pressure, etc.) in 165 patients, with some ulcers having failed prior advanced biologic therapies.
- Standard care was provided, with exclusions for actively infected wounds or hypersensitivity to DDHAM.
Main Results:
- Nearly 50% of chronic wounds achieved complete closure within a median of 6.3 weeks (average 8-week management).
- Factors influencing closure included infections, noncompliance, re-injury, and comorbidities.
- No product-related adverse experiences were reported.
Conclusions:
- DDHAM demonstrated safety and clinical benefit in supporting wound closure for various chronic wound types.
- The registry study confirmed DDHAM's utility in real-world clinical environments despite challenging, uncontrolled factors.
- DDHAM offers a viable option for wound management across diverse patient conditions.

