Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

14.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
14.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.5K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

18.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
18.3K
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

6.9K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
6.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

564
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
564

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cochrane evaluation of (semi-)automated review methods: protocol for an adaptive platform study within reviews.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Reviewing ecosystems of evidence: synthesising the evidence on the commercial determinants of health from a complex systems perspective.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Effects of active travel interventions in the UK on disadvantaged population groups and their potential to reduce health inequalities: systematic review.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Routine Clinical Deployment of an Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Assistant for Cataract Follow-Up in the National Health Service.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Comparison of AI-assisted and human-produced podcasts derived from Cochrane Plain Language Summaries: protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial (Health Information Effectiveness Trials-2).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research.

Implementation science : IS·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
09:20

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications

Published on: February 23, 2019

9.3K

Applications of text mining within systematic reviews.

James Thomas1, John McNaught2, Sophia Ananiadou2

  • 1Institute of Education EPPI-Centre, SSRU 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NR, U.K.. j.thomas@ioe.ac.uk.

Research Synthesis Methods
|June 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Text mining technologies can help speed up systematic reviews by identifying and summarizing relevant studies. Further research is needed to fully assess their impact on review efficiency.

Keywords:
automatic summarizationdocument classificationdocument clusteringresearch synthesisscreeningsearchingsystematic reviewterm recognitiontext mining

More Related Videos

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.7K
A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
07:35

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 11, 2026

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
09:20

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications

Published on: February 23, 2019

9.3K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.7K
A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports
07:35

A Knowledge Graph Approach to Elucidate the Role of Organellar Pathways in Disease via Biomedical Reports

Published on: October 13, 2023

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Information Science
  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial but time-consuming, especially with limited databases.
  • Efficiency challenges hinder timely policy and practice integration.
  • Text mining offers potential solutions for literature identification and summarization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore text mining applications for enhancing systematic review efficiency.
  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of text mining in review processes.
  • To assess the potential impact of text mining on systematic review timelines.

Main Methods:

  • Application of four text mining technologies: automatic term recognition, document clustering, classification, and summarization.
  • Focus on supporting the identification of relevant studies within systematic reviews.
  • Analysis of contributions to reviewing efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Text mining technologies can assist in identifying, categorizing, and summarizing literature for systematic reviews.
  • These tools show potential for improving the efficiency of the review process.
  • Current adoption is low, with a need for more evaluation and development.

Conclusions:

  • Text mining has the potential to significantly improve systematic review efficiency.
  • Widespread adoption requires further evaluation and methods development.
  • The systematic reviewing community needs greater awareness and understanding of these technologies.