Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

7.1K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
7.1K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.5K
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

24.4K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
24.4K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.6K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond one-shot nudges: the effects of repeated interventions for healthier online meal ordering.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

Racial discrimination and life satisfaction in non-Western contexts: examining the moderating role of migration in Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, and Ukraine.

Ethnicity & health·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Social bias blind spots: Attractiveness bias is seemingly tolerated because people fail to notice the bias.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

County-to-county migration is associated with county-level racial bias in the United States.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Competition increases the magnitude of dishonest reporting even when controlling for reward uncertainty.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes.

Jesse Chandler1, Gabriele Paolacci2, Eyal Peer3

  • 1Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Mathematica Policy Research, Ann Arbor, MI jjchandl@umich.edu.

Psychological Science
|June 12, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prior exposure to experimental tasks significantly reduces effect sizes in subsequent studies. This effect is strongest when participants are in a different condition during retesting, impacting research reliability.

Keywords:
effect sizesjudgment and decision makingnonnaïvetéopen dataopen materialspanel conditioningrepeated participationresearch methods

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

60.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

60.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Experimental Design
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Researchers often assume participant naivety to experimental tasks.
  • Prior participant exposure to tasks can influence subsequent study outcomes.
  • Understanding participant familiarity is crucial for reliable experimental results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of prior task exposure on experimental results.
  • To quantify the reduction in effect sizes upon repeated task completion.
  • To explore how condition changes affect results after initial exposure.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed 12 experimental tasks twice.
  • The second completion occurred days, a week, or a month after the first.
  • Participants were sometimes assigned to different experimental conditions for the second completion.

Main Results:

  • Effect sizes were substantially lower during the second task completion wave compared to the first.
  • The decrease in effect size was most significant when participants were in a different condition during the second wave.
  • Prior exposure demonstrably alters participant responses and reduces observed effects.

Conclusions:

  • Participant naivety is not a universal assumption in experimental research.
  • Prior exposure to tasks can attenuate effect sizes, challenging replication validity.
  • Methodological considerations regarding participant experience are essential for robust experimental design.