Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.3K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.3K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

17.2K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
17.2K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

44
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
44

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epidemiology and treatment trends of retinopathy of prematurity: a multi-center study involving four Asian centers and one European center (2016-2023).

Japanese journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Visual and refractive outcomes of retinopathy of prematurity in school-age patients.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

Quantitative measurement of stag beetle behaviors in low light and complex background conditions using DAMM (detect any mouse model).

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Keep calm and carry on: bites from Trichonephila clavata are unlikely and cause minimal discomfort.

Journal of medical entomology·2025
Same author

Chemical management strategies for the invasive Jorō spider, Trichonephila clavata (Araneae: Araneidae).

Journal of economic entomology·2025
Same author

Advancements in ocular blood flow imaging: Clinical applications of laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal and choroidal vascular diseases.

Survey of ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

10.1K

Can differential nutrient extraction explain property variations in a predatory trap?

Sean J Blamires1, Dakota Piorkowski2, Angela Chuang2

  • 1Department of Life Science , Tunghai University, Taichung 40704 , Taiwan, Republic of China ; Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences , The University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.

Royal Society Open Science
|June 12, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spider web architecture and stickiness change based on the nutrients extracted from prey. Different prey types, like crickets and flies, alter web construction and silk use in Nephila pilipes spiders.

Keywords:
animal architectureextended phenotypemechanical propertiesnutrient-specific foragingorb webstrap-building predator

More Related Videos

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

10.5K
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
16:03

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms

Published on: January 11, 2015

10.1K
Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
06:27

Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes

Published on: September 4, 2016

10.5K
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
10:17

Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers

Published on: October 5, 2017

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Arachnology
  • Animal Nutrition

Background:

  • Predators adapt foraging strategies to obtain essential nutrients.
  • Trap-building predators may select prey through differential nutrient extraction and flexible trap architecture.
  • The spider species Nephila pilipes is known for its complex web structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if differential nutrient extraction influences the architecture and stickiness of Nephila pilipes spider webs.
  • To determine how specific prey types (crickets and flies) and their nutritional content affect web construction.
  • To explore the relationship between prey nutrient composition and spider web characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Nephila pilipes spiders were fed different prey treatments: live crickets (CC), live flies (FF), dead crickets stimulated by flies (CD), and dead flies stimulated by crickets (FD).
  • Nutrient extraction was analyzed by measuring protein, lipid, and carbohydrate content consumed by the spiders.
  • Web architecture (radii, catching area, silk use) and stickiness were quantified for each treatment group.

Main Results:

  • Spiders in the CD group consumed less protein per lipid or carbohydrate mass.
  • Spiders in the FF group consumed less carbohydrates per protein mass.
  • The CD group built stickier webs using less silk, while the FF group built larger webs with more silk and radii.

Conclusions:

  • Differential nutrient extraction appears to be a key factor driving prey-induced variations in spider web architecture and stickiness.
  • Nephila pilipes spiders adjust web properties in response to the nutritional profile of their prey.
  • This study provides evidence for nutrient-based prey selection influencing the physical characteristics of spider webs.