Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resolving disputes over frozen embryos.

J A Robertson1

  • 1School of Law, University of Texas, Austin.

The Hastings Center Report
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Disputes over frozen embryos in IVF highlight the need for clear agreements. Couples undergoing in vitro fertilization should pre-determine embryo disposition to avoid legal conflicts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remarks on Iritis.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Remarks on Amaurosis, with Cases.

Edinburgh medical and surgical journal·2018
Same author

Sleep disturbance in patients taking opioid medication for chronic back pain.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Renewal of Menstruation and Subsequent Pregnancy after Removal of Both Ovaries.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Physicians rally against threat of a nuclear epidemic.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Chalk river nuclear laboratories.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive medicine
  • Bioethics
  • Family law

Background:

  • Legal disputes regarding the disposition of frozen embryos from in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs are increasing.
  • These cases often involve conflicting views on reproductive choice and familial obligations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the legal and ethical considerations surrounding the disposition of cryopreserved embryos.
  • To advocate for proactive measures to resolve disputes over embryo fate.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent legal cases concerning frozen embryo disposition.
  • Analysis of ethical principles related to reproductive autonomy and family law.

Main Results:

  • Current legal frameworks are insufficient to address the complexities of embryo disposition.
  • Lack of pre-determined instructions leads to protracted and contentious legal battles.

Conclusions:

  • Couples utilizing IVF technology should establish legally binding agreements for embryo disposition prior to treatment.
  • Advance directives can prevent future conflicts and respect individual reproductive choices.
Keywords:
Davis v. DavisGenetics and ReproductionJones v. YorkLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos