Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

09:04
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
Published on: March 16, 2015
13.5K
Differing Dynamics of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Coordination: Two-finger and Four-Finger Tapping Experiments
Kentaro Kodama1, Nobuhiro Furuyama2, Tetsunari Inamura3
1Kanagawa University, 3-27-1, Rokkakubashi, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan.
Plos One
|June 13, 2015
Summary
Finger-tapping experiments revealed that intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics differ, challenging the Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) model
Area of Science:
- Human motor control
- Coordination dynamics
- Psychophysics
Background:
- The Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) model describes inter-limb coordination dynamics.
- Previous studies suggested the HKB model equally describes intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination.
- Finger-tapping tasks are used to study coordination dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination dynamics are equally described by the HKB model.
- To compare movement stability in different phase modes and finger conditions within and between individuals.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted: intrapersonal (Experiment 1) and interpersonal (Experiment 2) finger-tapping.
- Participants tapped fingers paced by a metronome, with varying phase modes (in-phase, anti-phase) and finger conditions (two-finger, four-finger).
- Movement stability was assessed in both within-subject experiments.
Main Results:
- Experiment 1 (intrapersonal): No significant difference in movement stability between in-phase and anti-phase modes for the two-finger condition.
- Experiment 2 (interpersonal): No significant difference in movement stability between in-phase and anti-phase modes for the four-finger condition.
- Findings suggest different coordination dynamics for intrapersonal versus interpersonal systems, contradicting HKB model predictions.
Conclusions:
- Intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination systems exhibit distinct dynamics.
- Differences may stem from perceptual information availability and limb interaction complexity.
- The HKB model may not universally apply to both intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination.

