Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.8K
Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable.
C Emily Kleinrouweler1, Fiona M Cheong-See2, Gary S Collins3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|June 14, 2015
Summary
This review found many prognostic models in obstetrics, but most lack validation and performance data. Clinical implementation is not recommended until their usefulness is proven.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Medical Informatics
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Healthcare increasingly uses prognostic models for patient risk assessment.
- A growing number of prognostic models are published for maternal and fetal outcomes.
- Evaluating these models' clinical utility is crucial for effective healthcare planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review prognostic models in obstetrics.
- To assess their development, validation, and potential clinical advantages.
- To provide recommendations for future model development and assessment in obstetrics.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of MEDLINE up to July 2012.
- Identification and analysis of papers reporting prognostic models in obstetrics.
- Assessment of model performance measures, validation, and clinical applicability.
Main Results:
- 263 prognostic models for 40 outcomes were identified from 177 papers.
- Preeclampsia and preterm delivery were the most common predicted outcomes.
- Most models lacked adequate validation (8.7%), assessment of key performance measures (82.9%), and discussion of clinical applicability (11.0%).
- Newer models did not consistently outperform older ones.
Conclusions:
- A large number of obstetric prognostic models exist, but evidence of their performance and clinical utility is limited.
- Current models cannot be recommended for clinical implementation due to insufficient validation and impact data.
- Future research should focus on evaluating the performance and clinical impact of existing models.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
843
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
843
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
717
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
717
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
3.1K
A model is a theoretical way to understand a concept or an idea. Models can overcome barriers to health regardless of diverse economic and cultural backgrounds. In addition, models make the task easier by providing different ways to approach complex issues. There are two major health promotion models: the health belief model and the health promotion model.
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
3.1K

