Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.8K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.6K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.6K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.2K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.2K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

9.1K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
9.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "The effect of e-cigarette flavor bans on tobacco use" [Journal of Health Economics, 102, August 2025, 103013].

Journal of health economics·2026
Same author

The effects of e-cigarette and cigarette policies on queer youth.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same author

Chain Restaurant Calorie Posting Laws, Obesity, and Consumer Welfare.

Journal of the European Economic Association·2025
Same author

The effect of e-cigarette flavor bans on tobacco use.

Journal of health economics·2025
Same author

Improving the experience of health services for trans and gender-diverse young people and their families: an exploratory qualitative study.

Health and social care delivery research·2025
Same author

Calorie labeling laws: who is affected and why?

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K

Adjusting body mass for measurement error with invalid validation data.

Charles Courtemanche1, Joshua C Pinkston2, Jay Stewart3

  • 1Georgia State University, United States; United States.

Economics and Human Biology
|June 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel method to correct self-reported weight and height using validation data. Our percentile rank approach is more robust to survey context differences than standard regression methods, improving BMI estimates.

Keywords:
Body mass indexMeasurement errorObesityValidation data

More Related Videos

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

28.1K
Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
06:48

Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research

Published on: June 7, 2024

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survey Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Self-reported weight and height are common in surveys but prone to inaccuracies.
  • Existing validation methods rely on strong assumptions about measurement error consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more robust method for correcting self-reported anthropometric data using validation datasets.
  • To address limitations of standard regression-based corrections in survey research.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a new correction method using percentile ranks of reported weight and height.
  • Compared the proposed method with standard regression-based correction using three national datasets.
  • Assessed the impact of survey context on anthropometric misreporting.

Main Results:

  • The percentile rank method demonstrated greater robustness to variations in measurement error across surveys.
  • Standard regression correction was sensitive to differences in misreporting influenced by survey context.
  • The proposed method yielded more stable predicted BMI distributions.

Conclusions:

  • The percentile rank approach offers a more reliable correction for self-reported anthropometric data.
  • This method is crucial for accurate econometric analyses and obesity rate estimations.
  • Findings highlight the impact of survey context on data quality.