Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.8K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.8K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.8K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.8K
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling01:04

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

2.1K
The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
2.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.6K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.6K
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

861
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
861
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

2.0K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to "Potential Multiaxial Molecular Ferroelectricity through Chiral Cation Replacement".

Crystal growth & design·2026
Same author

Controlling the Guanidinium Cation Rotation by Cation-Ï€ Interactions.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Cardiovascular, limb, and kidney effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial data.

Cardiovascular diabetology·2026
Same author

Circulating inflammatory ILC2s as a biomarker of gastric cancer progression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

First-principles simulation of spin diffusion in static solids using dynamic mean-field theory.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Characterization of strongly hyperfine-split protons by DNP.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K

Simulating spin dynamics in organic solids under heteronuclear decoupling.

Ilya Frantsuzov1, Matthias Ernst2, Steven P Brown3

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.

Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
|June 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting nuclear spin dynamics with radio-frequency (RF) decoupling is difficult. Numerical simulations show promise for understanding RF decoupling sequences but face challenges in quantitative prediction.

Keywords:
DecouplingMagic-angle spinningNumerical simulationSolid-state NMR

More Related Videos

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.8K
Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
14:55

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: September 17, 2017

16.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

2.6K
Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.8K
Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
14:55

Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Published on: September 17, 2017

16.2K

Area of Science:

  • Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
  • Quantum dynamics simulations
  • Spin physics

Background:

  • Simulating coupled nuclear spin dynamics has advanced significantly.
  • Predicting nuclear magnetization evolution under radio-frequency (RF) decoupling remains a complex challenge.
  • Accurate simulations are crucial for optimizing experimental NMR techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the predictive capability of numerical simulations for heteronuclear decoupling.
  • To investigate the performance of CW, TPPM, and XiX RF decoupling sequences.
  • To model spin dynamics under magic-angle spinning and RF decoupling using glycine as a model.

Main Methods:

  • Exact numerical simulations of spin dynamics.
  • Simultaneous application of magic-angle spinning and RF decoupling.
  • Analysis of spin system dynamics, including signal decay times and spin echo effects.

Main Results:

  • Signal decay times strongly depend on the simulated spin order.
  • Significant differences observed in spin dynamics with and without spin echoes.
  • Qualitative trends are reproduced by modest simulations; extrapolation can mitigate finite-size effects.

Conclusions:

  • Numerical simulations can qualitatively predict RF decoupling trends.
  • Quantitative prediction in complex parameter spaces remains highly challenging.
  • Significant limitations exist for numerical simulations in RF decoupling, even with advanced techniques.