Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Accuracy of MRI-based Diagnoses for Distal Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Masses
Kathleen E McKeon1, Brian T Wright2, Donald H Lee3
1Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, 805 St. Vincent's Drive, Ste. 100, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Unlabelled:
To determine the accuracy of the pre-operative MRI-based diagnosis of soft tissue masses in the forearm, wrist, and hand, the records of 144 patients who underwent an MRI followed by excision of a soft tissue mass in the forearm, wrist, or hand were reviewed. The MRI-based diagnosis was compared to the histological diagnosis, which was considered the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MRI-based diagnosis were calculated. A multivariate regression analysis was performed.While the accuracy of the MRI-based diagnosis varied widely, there was an overall sensitivity of 75 %. The most accurate diagnosis was an MRI-based diagnosis of ganglion cyst, which had a sensitivity of 94.7 % and a specificity of 94.4 %. Of particular concern was that the MRI-based diagnosis of a malignancy was only 66.7 % sensitive, with a positive predictive value of 44.4 %. On multivariate regression analysis, there was a trend towards improved accuracy in the wrist when compared to the finger, although this did not reach statistical significance.While pre-operative MRI remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of soft tissue masses in the distal upper extremity, caution is warranted when basing the diagnosis on MRI evidence alone.
Level Of Evidence:
Level IV/Diagnostic.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

