Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Pesticides on the Larvae of the Solitary Bees
Published on: October 15, 2021
Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
David Kleijn1,2, Rachael Winfree3, Ignasi Bartomeus4
1Animal Ecology Team, Center for Ecosystem Studies, Alterra, Wageningen UR, PO Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
Related Concept Videos
Pollination and Flower Structure
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Conservation of Declining Populations
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Small Populations
Threats to Biodiversity

