Related Experiment Videos
Standing pressure distribution for normal and below-knee amputee children
J R Engsberg1, T L Allinger, J A Harder
1Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International
|December 1, 1989
Summary
Below-knee (BK) amputee children showed similar side-to-side weight distribution compared to normal children. However, their front-to-back weight distribution differed significantly, suggesting unique biomechanical adaptations in BK amputee children.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Pediatric orthopedics
- Prosthetics
Background:
- Children with below-knee (BK) amputation possess distinct morphologies compared to typically developing children.
- This morphological difference may lead to atypical limb loading during standing in amputee children.
- Understanding pressure distribution is crucial for assessing prosthetic effectiveness and child development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the standing ground-shoe pressure distribution between children with below-knee (BK) amputation and normal children.
- To identify potential differences in weight-bearing patterns during static standing.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a pressure plate system to quantify ground-shoe weight distribution.
- Recruited a cohort of three BK amputee children and ten normal children for the study.
- Collected data during standing posture for all participants.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the medial-lateral weight distribution between the prosthetic/non-prosthetic limbs of BK children and the feet of normal children.
- A significant difference was found in the anterior-posterior weight distribution for both prosthetic and non-prosthetic feet of BK children compared to normal children.
- These findings indicate altered anterior-posterior loading patterns in BK amputee children.
Conclusions:
- While medial-lateral balance appears comparable, BK amputee children exhibit distinct anterior-posterior weight distribution during standing.
- Further research with larger sample sizes is required to fully elucidate the clinical implications (benefits, detriments, or irrelevance) of these observed pressure distribution differences.
- Quantifying these biomechanical variations is essential for optimizing prosthetic design and gait training for pediatric amputees.