Mendelian randomization: where are we now and where are we going?

Stephen Burgess1, Nicholas J Timpson2, Shah Ebrahim3

  • 1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol Homerton College, University of Cambridge julia.mackay@bristol.ac.uk.

Summary

No abstract available in PubMed .

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
64.7K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

Overview
82.8K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

Overview
241.5K
Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance01:39

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

In 1866, Gregor Mendel published the results of his pea plant breeding experiments, providing evidence for predictable patterns in the inheritance of physical characteristics. The significance of his findings was not immediately recognized. In fact, the existence of genes was unknown at the time. Mendel referred to hereditary units as “factors.”
61.4K