The effect of a wrist-hand stretching device for spasticity in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients
Woo H Jang1, Hyuk C Kwon, Kyong J Yoo
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Yeungnam, Republic of Korea - strokerehab@hanmail.net.
Background:
The majority of these stretching devices have focused on spasticity of the leg and only a few devices have been developed for spasticity of the wrist and hand. In addition, most of these devices were large and complicated, with less easy applicability for personal use.
Aim:
To investigate the effect of a stretching device for spasticity of the wrist and hand in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients.
Design:
Prospective single blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
Setting:
Outpatients.
Methods:
Patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (11 patients) or the control group (10 patients). The stretching device consisted of a circular shaped plastic plate and five holders to immobilize the fingers. In position 1, finger tips were facing forward, position 2 was 90° external rotation from position 1, and position 3 was 90° external rotation from position 2. Each position was maintained for 4 minutes and a rest period of 1 minute was given, therefore, one session was performed for 14 minutes. The stretching program was conducted 3 sessions/day, 6 days/week for 4 weeks. Spasticity (modified Ashworth scale [MAS]) and motor function (Fugl-Meyer motor assessment [FMA], Active Range of Motion [AROM]) of affected wrist and hand were assessed three times (first assessment; Pre, second assessment; post-2 weeks, third assessment; post-4 weeks).
Results:
In the intervention group, significant differences in the wrist and hand MAS and FMA were observed between three assessment times (P<0.05). However, no significant differences in the wrist and hand AROM were observed between three assessment times (P>0.05). In the control group, no differences in MAS, FMA, and AROM were observed between three assessment times (P>0.05).
Conclusion:
Findings showed that this stretching device was effective in terms of relieving spasticity and functional recovery.
Clinical Rehabilitation Impact:
This stretching device is effective in spasticity reducing and motor function improvement. Moreover, it is useful to patient because it is easy to use and portable.
More Related Videos
03:55Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
Published on: October 27, 2023
08:55Use of a Foot-Induced Digitally Controlled Resistance Device for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation in Patients with Foot Paresis
Published on: July 7, 2023
