Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 9, 2026

Laparoscopic Choledochal Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy in Adults
Published on: February 28, 2025
Laparoscopic Treatment of Intestinal Malrotation in Children
Nina Ooms1, Lucas E M Matthyssens2, Jos MTh Draaisma1
1Department of Pediatrics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Laparoscopic surgery for intestinal malrotation in children has fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than laparotomy. Both methods show no difference in recurrent volvulus risk, making laparoscopy a viable first approach for stable patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Intestinal malrotation is a congenital anomaly requiring surgical correction.
- Surgical options include laparotomy and laparoscopy, with differing adhesion profiles.
- Laparoscopy is increasingly adopted for pediatric surgical procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for intestinal malrotation in children.
- To evaluate the hypothesis that laparoscopy reduces small bowel obstruction due to fewer adhesions.
- To assess the risk of recurrent volvulus with laparoscopic treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 83 pediatric patients (0-18 years) undergoing surgery for malrotation.
- Comparison of operative time, complications, hospital stay, and redo surgery rates between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups.
- Data collected from January 2004 to December 2011 at Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital.
Main Results:
- Laparoscopic procedures had similar operating times but significantly fewer complications (11% vs. 35%) and shorter hospital stays (9 vs. 16 days) compared to laparotomy.
- Redo surgery rates for obstruction were higher after laparotomy (5% vs. 0%), though not statistically significant.
- One early recurrent volvulus occurred in the laparoscopy group; no late volvulus was observed in either group.
Conclusions:
- Laparoscopy for intestinal malrotation in children offers comparable safety to laparotomy regarding recurrent volvulus risk.
- Laparotomy is associated with higher complication rates and longer hospital stays, potentially due to increased adhesions and subsequent obstruction.
- Laparoscopy is recommended as a primary approach for diagnosing and treating intestinal malrotation in stable pediatric patients aged 6 months and older.
Abstract:
Purpose Intestinal malrotation is a congenital intestinal rotation anomaly, which can be treated by either laparotomy or laparoscopy. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic treatment leads to less small bowel obstruction because of the fewer adhesions in comparison to laparotomy, without increasing the risk of recurrent volvulus. We analyzed the outcome of patients who had a correction for intestinal malrotation after the introduction of laparoscopy. Methods All patients between 0 and 18 years who underwent a surgical procedure for malrotation in the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, between January 2004 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed for duration of operation, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and rate of redo surgery for intestinal volvulus or obstruction. Results A total of 83 patients were included of which 33 had a laparoscopic procedure and 50 had a laparotomy for suspected malrotation. Operating time was 63 minutes for the laparoscopic procedure versus 76 minutes for laparotomy (p = 0.588). Significantly more complications were found in the laparotomy group (11 vs. 35%, p = 0.047). However, one patient (aged 4 months) in the laparoscopy group developed an early (< 24 hours) recurrent volvulus. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer after a laparotomy (9 vs. 16 days, p = 0.002). Three (17%) patients in the laparoscopy group needed redo surgery compared with six (9%) in the laparotomy group (p = 0.400). No late volvulus occurred in both groups. After laparotomy, redo surgery because of the small bowel obstruction was more frequent (5 vs. 0%), although this was not statistically significant. Conclusion In both the laparoscopy and laparotomy group, no cases of long-term recurrent volvulus were seen. After laparotomy, more patients developed a late small bowel obstruction because of the adhesions for which redo surgery was needed. In the laparotomy group, the number of complications was significantly higher and the length of hospital stay was significantly longer. Comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of malrotation, no difference exists for the long-term risk of recurrent volvulus. In children aged 6 months or older with suspicion of intestinal malrotation but not presenting with an acute abdomen or hemodynamically instability, laparoscopy should be considered as a first approach to diagnose and subsequently treat intestinal malrotation.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

