Microcirculatory response during on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Marc Bienz1, David Drullinsky2, Louis-Mathieu Stevens3

  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Perfusion
|June 21, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) showed transient microcirculatory benefits compared to on-pump CABG. However, these differences diminished postoperatively, suggesting temperature management may be key for preserving microcirculation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Microcirculation Research
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) triggers systemic inflammation and alters microcirculation.
  • Understanding the impact of surgical techniques on microcirculatory function is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether beating heart surgery (off-pump CABG, OPCABG) preserves sublingual microcirculation compared to conventional on-pump CABG (ONCABG).

Main Methods:

  • Sublingual microcirculation was assessed using Sidestream Darkfield Imaging during OPCABG and ONCABG.
  • Microcirculatory parameters were analyzed at eight perioperative time points.

Main Results:

  • Microcirculation quality declined during early ONCABG.
  • OPCABG demonstrated significantly better microcirculation for three parameters during surgery.
  • No significant differences in microcirculatory parameters were observed between groups by the end of surgery or postoperatively.

Conclusions:

  • OPCABG did not show marked microcirculatory preservation compared to ONCABG.
  • Observed microcirculatory changes correlated with body temperature fluctuations.
  • Active warming strategies may influence perioperative microcirculation parameters.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos