Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables01:28

Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables

357
Biologics, derived from living sources such as humans, animals, or microorganisms, represent a significant category of pharmaceuticals. These complex molecules, developed through advanced biotechnological methods or purified from natural sources, include essential medical treatments like insulin and growth hormones. The complexity of biologics arises from their large molecular structures and the intricate processes required for their production, making them distinct from conventional...
357
Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

2.3K
Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
2.3K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

401
In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
401
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

219
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
219
Pharmaceutical Equivalents01:26

Pharmaceutical Equivalents

262
As defined by regulatory standards, pharmaceutical equivalents require generic drug products to have identical dosage forms and chemically identical active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). They must adhere to compendial or applicable standards for potency, content uniformity, disintegration times, and dissolution rates. In the case of modified-release dosage forms, variations in drug content are permissible as long as the delivered amount remains consistent with the innovator drug product.
262
Drug Biotransformation: Overview01:16

Drug Biotransformation: Overview

4.2K
Pharmaceutical substances known as xenobiotics are predominantly lipophilic and nonionized. This enables them to permeate lipid bilayers, such as cell membranes, and interact with intracellular target receptors. Lipophilic drugs have an advantage in crossing biological barriers and reaching their intended sites of action. However, lipophilic drugs often have a restricted capacity for renal expulsion or elimination from the body. When these drugs enter the kidneys and undergo glomerular...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current drug therapies for rosacea: a chronic vascular and inflammatory skin disease.

Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy·2014
Same author

A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology.

Dermatology online journal·2014
Same author

Common reasons why acne patients call the office.

Dermatology online journal·2014
Same author

Improvement in severe psoriasis associated with isoniazid treatment.

Dermatology online journal·2014
Same author

Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2014
Same author

Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Synthesis of Stimuli-responsive Nanogels using Aqueous One-step Crosslinking and Co-nanopolymerization
06:26

Synthesis of Stimuli-responsive Nanogels using Aqueous One-step Crosslinking and Co-nanopolymerization

Published on: January 24, 2025

2.1K

Biologics and biosimilars.

Palak K Patel1, Caleb R King, Steven R Feldman

  • 1Health Information Technology, Grady Health System , Atlanta, GA , USA .

The Journal of Dermatological Treatment
|June 25, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Biosimilars offer competitive alternatives to biologic drugs, but are not exact replicas. Approving and using these complex biological medicines requires balancing cost with potential variations in clinical effects.

Keywords:
Biologicsbiosimilarsinterchangeabilitylow-molecular weight drugmanufacturingvariability

More Related Videos

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K
Laboratory Scale Production and Purification of a Therapeutic Antibody
09:54

Laboratory Scale Production and Purification of a Therapeutic Antibody

Published on: January 24, 2017

18.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Synthesis of Stimuli-responsive Nanogels using Aqueous One-step Crosslinking and Co-nanopolymerization
06:26

Synthesis of Stimuli-responsive Nanogels using Aqueous One-step Crosslinking and Co-nanopolymerization

Published on: January 24, 2025

2.1K
In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

18.3K
Laboratory Scale Production and Purification of a Therapeutic Antibody
09:54

Laboratory Scale Production and Purification of a Therapeutic Antibody

Published on: January 24, 2017

18.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Pharmacology
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Biological drugs are large, complex glycoprotein molecules produced in living organisms.
  • Patent expiration for innovator biologics creates opportunities for biosimilar development.
  • Biosimilars are highly similar but not identical to innovator biologic drugs due to inherent complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the implications of biosimilar development in dermatology.
  • To address the challenges in regulating and prescribing biosimilars.
  • To highlight the need for careful consideration of batch variability and clinical effects.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing guidelines on biosimilar approval and naming.
  • Analysis of the inherent batch-to-batch variability in biologic drugs.
  • Comparison of biosimilar data requirements with innovator product variations.

Main Results:

  • Biosimilars, while not identical, are designed to have similar clinical effects.
  • Innovator biologics also exhibit batch-to-batch variability, accepted in clinical practice.
  • Uncertainty exists regarding the precise clinical impact of variations in both innovator and biosimilar products.

Conclusions:

  • Biosimilars should be viewed as unique therapeutic interventions requiring distinct identification.
  • Balancing cost-effectiveness and development timelines with biological response variability is crucial for biosimilar adoption.
  • Physician awareness and notification are important for the safe and effective use of biosimilars.