Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale PFO: An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Stroke and patent foramen ovale: intervene or wait
Arti Khistriya1, Rannie Nahas1, Muhammad Javaid Hameed Rahmani1
1Conquest Hospital, St Leonards on Sea TN33 0PP, UK.
Abstract:
A 33-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with an acute left partial anterior circulation ischaemic stroke. Thrombolysis was not administered due to a rapidly improving National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and she was thereafter given appropriate treatment for secondary prevention. CT and MRI demonstrated a left basal ganglia infarct with haemorrhagic transformation. Initial investigations revealed no evidence of atrial fibrillation or large vessel disease. Further investigation with transthoracic, bubble contrast and transoesophageal echocardiogram all indicated the presence of a grade 1 tunnel-shaped patent foramen ovale (PFO) with some aneurysmal interatrial septum. No other cause for her stroke was found. There is no current evidence to support the routine use of percutaneous PFO closure in prevention of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. National guidelines advise transcatheter closure of PFO should only be considered for patients with recurrent cryptogenic stroke on optimal medical management.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

