Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microcephaly-associated protein WDR62 supports purine metabolism by interacting with co-chaperone BAG2.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

WDR62 is required for proper proliferation and early differentiation of skeletal myoblasts.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Presynaptic Neurotransmission: A Bottleneck to Recovery From General Anesthesia?

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Wakefulness can be distinguished from general anesthesia and sleep in flies using a massive library of univariate time series analyses.

PLoS biology·2025
Same author

A basic role for glia in sleep homeostasis.

Nature neuroscience·2025
Same author

Long-term multichannel recordings in Drosophila flies reveal altered predictive processing during sleep compared with wake.

The Journal of experimental biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Light Preference Assay to Study Innate and Circadian Regulated Photobehavior in Drosophila Larvae
07:14

Light Preference Assay to Study Innate and Circadian Regulated Photobehavior in Drosophila Larvae

Published on: April 20, 2013

13.6K

Dscam2 affects visual perception in Drosophila melanogaster.

Danny S Bosch1, Bruno van Swinderen2, S Sean Millard1

  • 1School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|June 25, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Drosophila melanogaster

Keywords:
DrosophilaDscambehavioral assaymotion detectionvisual perception

More Related Videos

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis
07:16

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Dissection and Immunohistochemistry of Larval, Pupal and Adult Drosophila Retinas
11:58

Dissection and Immunohistochemistry of Larval, Pupal and Adult Drosophila Retinas

Published on: November 14, 2012

26.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Light Preference Assay to Study Innate and Circadian Regulated Photobehavior in Drosophila Larvae
07:14

Light Preference Assay to Study Innate and Circadian Regulated Photobehavior in Drosophila Larvae

Published on: April 20, 2013

13.6K
Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis
07:16

Light Spot-Based Assay for Analysis of Drosophila Larval Phototaxis

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Dissection and Immunohistochemistry of Larval, Pupal and Adult Drosophila Retinas
11:58

Dissection and Immunohistochemistry of Larval, Pupal and Adult Drosophila Retinas

Published on: November 14, 2012

26.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule 2 (Dscam2) is vital for visual system development in fruit flies.
  • Dscam2 establishes boundaries in the optic lobe, but its role in behavior is unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the behavioral consequences of compromised visual system modularity in Dscam2 mutant fruit flies.

Main Methods:

  • Phototaxis assays to assess light response.
  • Optomotor assays (population and single-fly) to evaluate motion tracking.
  • Fixation paradigm to analyze visual stimulus control.

Main Results:

  • Dscam2 mutants exhibit reduced phototaxis but are not blind.
  • Mutant flies track motion but respond oppositely to controls.
  • Fixation paradigm reveals diametrically opposed responses in mutants.

Conclusions:

  • Altered visual system modularity in Dscam2 mutants significantly impacts visual cue perception.
  • These changes lead to modified visual behaviors in fruit flies.