International Values of Central Pachymetry in Normal Subjects by Rotating Scheimpflug Camera
Matthew T Feng1, Joan T Kim, Renato Ambrósio
1From the *Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; †Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; ‡Grewal Eye Institute, Chandigarh, India; §Tianjin Eye Hospital and Eye Institute, Key Laboratory in Vision and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; ¶Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt; ||Department of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; **Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan; and ††AaM Augenklinik Marienplatz Munich, Munich; ‡‡Center for Vision Science, Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum; and §§OCULUS Optikgeraete GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany.
Purpose:
In corneal refractive surgery, postoperative ectasia risk assessment routinely includes pachymetric analysis at the apex and thinnest point. We examined whether these data differ worldwide and constructed preliminary country-specific normative thresholds.
Design:
This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study.
Methods:
Using the Pentacam Eye Scanner (OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), we examined 1 randomly selected eye from each of 555 normal adults (8 countries, 6 continents), measuring the thinnest point location, central pachymetry (thinnest point, pupillary center, and apex), and the apex-thinnest point difference. International differences were assessed by 1-way analysis of variance. Normative thresholds were defined by 2- and 3-SD gates or Tukey method.
Results:
The thinnest point averaged 0.44 mm temporal and 0.29 mm inferior to the apex. Individual thinnest points located more than 1.0 mm inferior represented fewer than 0.5% of normal corneas (>0.76 mm in the US subgroup). The mean thinnest-point pachymetry was 536 μm overall, and values less than 469 or 435 μm (-2 or -3 SD, respectively) would be expected in less than 2.5% or 0.15% of normal corneas, respectively. The thinnest-point pachymetry averaged 2 to 3 μm thinner than apical (range, 0-32 μm). Differences of greater than 8.5 μm would be expected in less than 0.5% of normal corneas overall.
Conclusions:
International differences were largely clinically insignificant. Nevertheless, it remains preferable to establish racial/geographic-specific normative values. We defined preliminary generalized and country-specific thresholds useful to the corneal refractive surgeon for identifying potentially abnormal corneas based on common pachymetric parameters, particularly the thinnest point by tomography.
Related Concept Videos
Central Tendency: Analysis
The mean is one such measure, calculated by totaling all values in a dataset and dividing by the number of values. For instance, the mean blood pressure reading (120, 130, 140, 150) would be 135. However, the mean can be affected by extreme values or outliers.
The median, another measure,...
Applications of Normal Distribution
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...
Central Limit Theorem
The sample size, n, that...
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation


