Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026
Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Assessment of vascular dysfunction after transradial coronary angiography. Is a single catheter better?
Ahmet Çağrı Aykan1, Ezgi Kalaycıoğlu2, Tayyar Gökdeniz2
1Department of Cardiology, Ahi Evren Chest Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Soğuksu Mah, Çamlık Street, 61040, Trabzon, Turkey. ahmetaykan@yahoo.com.
Background:
The aim of this study was to investigate the midterm effects of transradial coronary angiography (TRCAG) on the radial and brachial artery diameter, the vasodilator characteristics, as well as to assess the factors determining functional recovery.
Methods:
This study included 136 consecutive patients who underwent TRCAG. The radial artery was evaluated with ultrasonography before and 1 month after the procedure.
Results:
The basal right radial artery diameter (2.97 ± 0.46 vs. 2.82 ± 0.51, p < 0.001), after flow-mediated dilatation (FMD; 3.18 ± 0.45 vs. 2.99 ± 0.54, p < 0.001) and after nitroglycerin-mediated dilatation (NMD; 3.32 ± 0.45 vs. 3.11 ± 0.54, p < 0.001), and the percentage change in diameter after FMD (7.50 ± 3.62 vs. 5.89 ± 3.04, p < 0.001) and NMD (12.42 ± 4.96 vs. 10.54 ± 4.47, p < 0.001) were significantly decreased 1 month after TRCAG. The mean basal diameter of the right brachial artery (4.41 ± 0.58 vs. 4.40 ± 0.58, p = 0.012) after FMD (4.61 ± 0.60 vs. 4.59 ± 0.59, p < 0.001) and the percentage change in diameter after FMD (4.53 ± 2.29 vs. 4.33 ± 2.56, p = 0.038) were significantly decreased 1 month after TRCAG. The number of catheters used (B = 0.372, p < 0.001, 95 % CI = 0.006-0.013), basal radial artery diameter (B = - 0.217, p = 0.001, 95 % CI = - 0.021- 0.006), presence of hypertension (B = - 0.151, p = 0.011, 95 % CI = - 0.015 - 0.002), and pain score (B = 0.493, p < 0.001, 95 % CI = 0.007 - 0.012) were independent predictors of radial artery FMD change in multivariate regression analysis. The number of catheters used (B = 0.378, p < 0.001, 95 % CI = 0.009 - 0.020), basal radial artery diameter (B = - 0.210, p = 0.010, 95 % CI = - 0.034 - 0.005), and pain score (B = 0.221, p < 0.001, 95 % CI = 0.002-0.011) were independent predictors of radial artery NMD change in multivariate regression analysis.
Conclusion:
Basal radial artery diameter, the number of catheters used during TRCAG, and the pain perceived during the procedure seem to be important predictors of vascular functional changes after TRCAG.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
01:21Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
01:11Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
01:23Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
01:29Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck