Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Safety and Tolerability of Oral Islatravir Once Monthly as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have an Elevated Likelihood of HIV-1 Exposure: Results From the IMPOWER-24 Randomized Phase 3 Study.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026

Same author

A Two-Component <i>G</i>-Prior for Variable Selection.

Bayesian analysis·2026

Same author

Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Revaccination With mRNA-1345, an mRNA Vaccine Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Administered 12 Months Following a Primary Dose in Adults Aged ≥50 Years.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2025

Same author

Immune correlates analysis of mRNA-1345 RSV vaccine efficacy clinical trial.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1345 in Adults at Increased Risk for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Aged 18-59 Years.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2025

Same author

High-Throughput Microarray Approaches for Predicting the Stability of Drug-Polymer Solid Dispersions.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2024

Same journal

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same journal

Semiparametric Joint Modeling for Survival Analysis with Longitudinal Covariates.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same journal

Dimension Reduction for Large-Scale Federated Data: Statistical Rate and Asymptotic Inference.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same journal

Facilitating Heterogeneous Effect Estimation via Statistically Efficient Categorical Modifiers.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same journal

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

Same journal

Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

Size and Shape Analysis of Error-Prone Shape Data.

Jiejun Du, Ian L Dryden, Xianzheng Huang

Journal of the American Statistical Association

|June 26, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing object shapes with landmark data is challenging due to measurement error. A new conditional score method ensures accurate shape comparisons, outperforming traditional Procrustes analysis when errors are present.

Keywords:

Complex normal Configuration Landmark Ordinary Procrustes analysis Quaternion

More Related Videos

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Three-Dimensional Shape Modeling and Analysis of Brain Structures

Published on: November 14, 2019

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

Area of Science:

Geometric Morphometrics
Statistical Shape Analysis
Biometrics

Background:

Comparing object shapes and sizes using landmark data is crucial in various scientific fields.
Ordinary Procrustes analysis is a common method but can be unreliable when landmark data contain measurement errors.
Ignoring measurement error can lead to compromised inferences in shape and size comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the limitations of traditional methods in shape comparison under measurement error.
To propose a novel statistical method, the conditional score method, for robust landmark data analysis.
To demonstrate the superiority of the conditional score method over naive Procrustes analysis in the presence of measurement error.

Main Methods:

Development and application of the conditional score method for matching landmark configurations.
Comparative analysis using simulations to evaluate method performance under varying error levels.
Real-world data application to showcase practical utility in shape analysis.

Main Results:

Naive Procrustes analysis yields compromised inference when measurement error is present in landmark data.
The proposed conditional score method provides consistent and reliable inference even with measurement error.
Simulations and real data examples confirm the effectiveness and improved accuracy of the conditional score method.

Conclusions:

Measurement error significantly impacts the reliability of shape and size comparisons using ordinary Procrustes analysis.
The conditional score method offers a robust and statistically sound alternative for analyzing landmark data with inherent measurement error.
This method enhances the accuracy of geometric morphometric analyses across diverse scientific applications.