Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

578
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
578
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

14.9K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
14.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.4K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

7.1K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
7.1K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.7K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.7K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

471
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
471

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis: Correlation with White Blood Cells over Time and a Possible Role as the Outcome Predictor.

Blood purification·2023
Same author

Analysis of annual distributions of hemoglobin A<sub>2</sub> values as a method to test for HbA<sub>2</sub> standardization.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2023
Same author

Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

RMD open·2023
Same author

Peritoneal NGAL: a reliable biomarker for PD-peritonitis monitoring.

Journal of nephrology·2023
Same author

Relationship between Residual Urine Output and Type of Dialysis with FGF23 Levels.

Journal of clinical medicine·2023
Same author

Evaluating the role of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen ECLIA immunoassay in the management of the SARS COV 2 pandemic on general population.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K

Understanding Bland Altman analysis.

Davide Giavarina1

  • 1Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

Biochemia Medica
|June 26, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bland Altman analysis is a statistical method to assess agreement between two quantitative measurements, unlike correlation which studies relationships. This guide explains its use and interpretation for clinical laboratory method comparison studies.

Keywords:
Bland-Altmanagreement analysiscorrelation of datalaboratory researchmethod comparison

More Related Videos

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

10.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

10.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Diagnostics

Background:

  • Assessing agreement between quantitative measurement methods is common in clinical labs.
  • Correlation and regression are often misused for method comparison.
  • Bland Altman analysis offers a superior approach for evaluating measurement agreement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on the application and interpretation of Bland Altman analysis.
  • To clarify the distinction between correlation and agreement assessment.
  • To highlight the importance of defining acceptable agreement limits based on clinical context.

Main Methods:

  • Description of Bland Altman (B&A) plot analysis.
  • Explanation of mean difference and limits of agreement.
  • Discussion of unit differences and percentage differences plots.

Main Results:

  • B&A plots visualize bias and estimate agreement intervals (95% of differences).
  • The method quantifies agreement but does not determine acceptability.
  • Acceptable limits require pre-defined clinical or biological criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Bland Altman analysis is recommended for method comparison over correlation.
  • Proper interpretation requires understanding the B&A plot and defining acceptance criteria.
  • This guidance aids accurate assessment of measurement method comparability.