Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

10:15
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
18.5K
Using functional imaging to understand therapeutic effects in poststroke aphasia
Jennifer T Crinion1, Alexander P Leff
1aNeurotherapuetics Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience bDepartment of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK.
Current Opinion in Neurology
|June 26, 2015
Summary
Neuroimaging studies reveal patterns of brain activity associated with post-stroke aphasia therapy improvements. However, methodological variations and the role of non-language cognitive processes require further investigation for predictable recovery.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Interest in neural mechanisms of post-stroke aphasia treatment is growing.
- While most patients improve with therapy, response predictability varies.
- Recent research focuses on understanding therapy-driven neural changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent literature on neural mechanisms underlying post-stroke aphasia therapy.
- To categorize studies based on whether they target speech perception or production.
- To identify emerging themes in aphasia recovery research.
Main Methods:
- Review of 17 recent articles on post-stroke aphasia treatment and neural mechanisms.
- Categorization of studies by language task (speech perception vs. production).
- Analysis of neuroimaging findings and their correlation with behavioral improvements.
Main Results:
- Consistent activation/correlation in left hemisphere fronto-temporal cortex for language improvement.
- Frequent identification of the right inferior frontal gyrus, though its role is debated.
- Methodological differences complicate direct attribution of neuroimaging changes to therapy.
Conclusions:
- Functional neuroimaging studies in aphasia research are increasing.
- Behavioral and structural imaging data alone are insufficient to explain therapy responses.
- The influence of non-language cognitive processes on aphasia recovery is an important emerging area.

