Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Swab Sampling Method for the Detection of Human Norovirus on Surfaces
Published on: February 6, 2017
Evaluation of a New Environmental Sampling Protocol for Detection of Human Norovirus on Inanimate Surfaces
Geun Woo Park1, David Lee2, Aimee Treffiletti3
1Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA gpark@cdc.gov.
Abstract:
Inanimate surfaces are regarded as key vehicles for the spread of human norovirus during outbreaks. ISO method 15216 involves the use of cotton swabs for environmental sampling from food surfaces and fomites for the detection of norovirus genogroup I (GI) and GII. We evaluated the effects of the virus drying time (1, 8, 24, or 48 h), swab material (cotton, polyester, rayon, macrofoam, or an antistatic wipe), surface (stainless steel or a toilet seat), and area of the swabbed surface (25.8 cm(2) to 645.0 cm(2)) on the recovery of human norovirus. Macrofoam swabs produced the highest rate of recovery of norovirus from surfaces as large as 645 cm(2). The rates of recovery ranged from 2.2 to 36.0% for virus seeded on stainless-steel coupons (645.0 cm(2)) to 1.2 to 33.6% for toilet seat surfaces (700 cm(2)), with detection limits of 3.5 log10 and 4.0 log10 RNA copies. We used macrofoam swabs to collect environmental samples from several case cabins and common areas of a cruise ship where passengers had reported viral gastroenteritis symptoms. Seventeen (18.5%) of 92 samples tested positive for norovirus GII, and 4 samples could be sequenced and had identical GII.1 sequences. The viral loads of the swab samples from the cabins of the sick passengers ranged from 80 to 31,217 RNA copies, compared with 16 to 113 RNA copies for swab samples from public spaces. In conclusion, our swab protocol for norovirus may be a useful tool for outbreak investigations when no clinical samples are available to confirm the etiology.
Insights
Macrofoam swabs effectively recover human norovirus from various surfaces, aiding outbreak investigations. This method is crucial for detecting norovirus (GI and GII) when clinical samples are unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Virology
- Public health
Background:
- Inanimate surfaces facilitate human norovirus transmission during outbreaks.
- Current ISO method 15216 uses cotton swabs for environmental norovirus sampling.
- Optimizing sampling methods is essential for accurate norovirus detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate factors influencing human norovirus recovery from surfaces.
- To compare the efficacy of different swab materials and surface types.
- To validate a novel swab protocol for norovirus outbreak investigations.
Main Methods:
- Assessed virus drying time (1-48h), swab material (cotton, polyester, rayon, macrofoam, antistatic wipe), surface type (stainless steel, toilet seat), and swabbing area (25.8-645.0 cm²).
- Utilized macrofoam swabs for environmental sampling on a cruise ship with reported viral gastroenteritis.
- Quantified norovirus genogroup I (GI) and GII RNA copies using RT-qPCR.
Main Results:
- Macrofoam swabs demonstrated the highest norovirus recovery rates across tested surfaces and areas.
- Recovery rates varied from 1.2% to 36.0% depending on swab material, surface, and drying time.
- Detected norovirus GII in 18.5% of cruise ship environmental samples, with high viral loads in case cabins.
Conclusions:
- Macrofoam swabs offer a superior method for environmental norovirus sampling compared to standard cotton swabs.
- The developed swab protocol is effective for norovirus detection in outbreak settings, especially when clinical samples are limited.
- This method can aid in identifying sources and extent of norovirus contamination during public health emergencies.
More Related Videos
10:48EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. I. Collection of Virus Samples
Published on: March 28, 2015
12:32EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR
Published on: January 16, 2016