Related Experiment Video For apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
Updated: Apr 8, 2026
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer
Yu Ueda1, Satoru Takahashi2, Naoki Ohno3
1Division of Radiology, Kobe University Hospital, Chuo-ku Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Background:
To evaluate more detailed information noninvasively through on diffusion and perfusion in prostate cancer (PCa) using triexponential analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
Methods:
Sixty-three prostate cancer patients underwent preoperative 3.0 Tesla MRI including eight b-values DWI. Triexponential analysis was performed to obtain three diffusion coefficients (Dp , Df , Ds ), as well as fractions (Fp , Ff , Fs ). Each diffusion parameter for cancerous lesions and normal tissues was compared and the relationship between diffusion parameters and Gleason score (GS) was assessed. K(trans) , Ve , and the ratios of intracellular components measured in histopathological specimens were compared with diffusion parameters.
Results:
Dp was significantly greater for cancerous lesions than normal peripheral zone (PZ) (P < 0.001), whereas Dp in transition zone (TZ) showed no significant difference (P = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.69-6.48). Ds was significantly smaller for each cancerous lesions in PZ and TZ (P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in Df between cancerous lesions and normal tissues in PZ and TZ (P = 0.07, 95% CI = -0.29-0.12 and P = 0.53, 95% CI = -3.51-2.29, respectively). D obtained with biexponential analysis were significantly smaller in cancerous lesions than in normal tissue in PZ and TZ (P < 0.001 for both), while D* in PZ and TZ showed no significant difference (P = 0.14, 95% CI = -1.60-0.24 and P = 0.31, 95% CI = -3.43-1.16, respectively). Dp in PZ and TZ showed significant correlation with K(trans) (R = 0.85, P < 0.001; R = 0.81, P < 0.001, respectively), while D(*) in PZ obtained with biexponential analysis showed no such correlation (P = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.14-0.30). Fs was significantly correlated with intracellular space fraction evaluated in histopathological specimens in PZ and TZ cancer (R = 0.41, P < 0.05; R = 0.59, P < 0.001, respectively). Ff and Fs correlated significantly with GS in PZ and TZ cancer (PZ: R = -0.44, P < 0.05; R = 0.37, P < 0.05, TZ: R = -0.59, P < 0.05; R = 0.57, P < 0.05, respectively).
Conclusion:
Triexponential analysis is a noninvasive approach that can provide more detailed information regarding diffusion and perfusion of PCa than biexponential analysis.
