Subject-Based versus Population-Based Care after Radiation Exposure

In a mass casualty radiation event situation, individualized therapy may overwhelm available resources and feasibility issues suggest a need for the development of population-based strategies. To investigate the efficacy of a population-based strategy, Chinese macaques (n = 46) underwent total-body irradiation and received preemptive antibiotics, IV hydration on predetermined postirradiation days and were then compared to macaques (n = 48) that received subject-based care in which blood transfusions, IV hydration, nutritional supplementation and antibiotic supportive measures were provided. Estimated radiation doses for LD30/60, LD50/60 and LD70/60 of animals with subject-based care: 6.83 Gy (6.21, 7.59), 7.44 Gy (6.99, 7.88) and 8.05 Gy (7.46, 8.64), respectively, and for population-based care: 5.61 Gy (5.28, 6.17), 6.62 Gy (6.13, 7.18) and 7.63 Gy (7.21, 8.20), respectively. Analysis of four time periods, 0-9, 10-15, 16-25 and 26-60 days postirradiation, identified significant mortality differences during the period of 10-15 days. A subset analysis of higher radiation doses (6.75-7.20 Gy, n = 32) indicated hydration, nutrition and septic status were not significantly different between treatments. Whole blood transfusion treatment, administered only in subject-supportive care, was associated with significantly higher platelet and absolute neutrophil counts. Median platelet counts greater than 5,670 cells/μl and absolute neutrophil counts greater than 26 cells/μl during this period correlated with survival. We observed that the population-based treatment increased the LD50/60 compared to nontreatment (6.62 Gy vs. 4.92 Gy) and may be further optimized during days 10-15, where strategic blood transfusions or other strategies to achieve increases in neutrophil and platelet counts may further increase survival rates in subjects exposed to high doses of radiation.