Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
Published on: September 11, 2016
Evaluation and selection of decision-making methods to assess landfill mining projects
Robert Hermann1, Rupert J Baumgartner2, Stefan Vorbach3
1Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Leoben, Austria robert.hermann@unileoben.ac.at.
This study introduces a new decision-making framework for landfill mining feasibility in Austria. It evaluates methods like cost-utility analysis and analytical hierarchy process for assessing secondary raw material recovery projects.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Resource Management
- Economic Analysis
Background:
- Landfill mining offers potential for secondary raw material recovery.
- Existing assessment procedures lack comprehensive multi-criteria evaluation.
- The LAMIS - Landfill Mining Austria pilot project initiated fundamental studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a robust decision-making procedure for evaluating landfill mining project feasibility.
- To address the absence of standardized multi-criteria assessment methods.
- To compare landfill mining against continued landfill aftercare.
Main Methods:
- Utilized multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) frameworks.
- Developed a tiered assessment structure (preliminary and main).
- Selected and detailed Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
Main Results:
- Identified requirements and criteria for assessment methods.
- Classified the decision problem: landfill mining vs. retaining landfill in aftercare.
- Both CUA and AHP present distinct advantages and disadvantages for landfill mining assessment.
Conclusions:
- No single MADM method is universally superior for landfill mining feasibility studies.
- Integrating CUA or AHP with single-criteria methods (e.g., Net Present Value) may offer a more comprehensive approach.
- Further research into hybrid decision-making models is warranted for optimizing landfill mining project evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Leaching
Manipulation and Analysis
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Design Example: Aggregate Gradation
The grading, or particle-size distribution, of sand is determined using sieve analysis, with standard sizes ranging from 150 μm to 10 mm (ASTM No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in. sieve). Sand is...

