Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interest and limits of using pharmacogenetics in MDMA-related fatalities: A case report.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2025
Same author

Pitfalls and challenges associated with phenoconversion in forensic toxcicology.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2020
Same author

Author Correction: Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest-tree symbioses.

Nature·2019
Same author

Climatic controls of decomposition drive the global biogeography of forest-tree symbioses.

Nature·2019
Same author

Structural patterns of the human ABCC4/MRP4 exporter in lipid bilayers rationalize clinically observed polymorphisms.

Pharmacological research·2018
Same author

Response to Comment on "The extent of forest in dryland biomes".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2017
Same journal

Effect of Medication Intake on Dental Implant-Related Outcomes-A Scoping Review.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the Adjunctive Use of Er:YAG Laser or Erythritol Air-Polishing in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Pilot RCT.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial Comparing Cement-Retained Monolithic CAD-CAM Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns for Single Posterior Implant Restorations.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Block Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral for Guided Bone Regeneration of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive Electrolytic Implant Surface Decontamination in the Reconstructive Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing a One-Piece Zirconia Tissue-Level Implant and Two-Piece Titanium Bone-Level Implant for Maxillary Single Tooth Replacement-3 year Results.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K

Short implants compared to implants in vertically augmented bone: a systematic review.

D Nisand1, N Picard2, I Rocchietta3,4

  • 1Private Practice, Paris, France.

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|July 2, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Short implants and implants with vertical ridge augmentation show similar survival rates. However, vertical augmentation led to more surgical complications, warranting cautious interpretation due to study limitations.

Keywords:
short dental implantssystematic reviewvertical ridge augmentation

More Related Videos

Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis
02:08

Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis

Published on: July 5, 2024

1.7K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K
Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis
02:08

Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis

Published on: July 5, 2024

1.7K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Oral Implantology
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Dental implant success relies on bone quantity and quality.
  • Vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) and short implants are options for bone-deficient sites.
  • Comparing these approaches is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare implant survival and prosthetic success rates between short implants and implants placed in vertically augmented bone.
  • To evaluate the incidence of surgical complications associated with each treatment modality.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) was conducted.
  • Searches were performed on PubMed and via hand search, including English-language publications.
  • Four studies met the inclusion criteria for full-text analysis.

Main Results:

  • Implant survival rates were comparable: 95.09% for vertically augmented bone and 96.24% for short implants.
  • No significant differences were observed in prosthetic survival rates between the two groups.
  • Surgical complications were more frequent in the vertical ridge augmentation group (56 patients) compared to the short implant group (18 patients).

Conclusions:

  • Short implants and implants in vertically augmented bone demonstrate similar long-term survival and prosthetic success.
  • Vertical ridge augmentation is associated with a higher risk of surgical complications.
  • Findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size, follow-up duration, and the single research group involved in the included RCTs.