Complications following conversion of a hip hemiarthroplasty to a total hip arthroplasty
Simcha G Fichman1, Tatu J Mäkinen2, Alex Vincent1
1Mount Sinai Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
Insights
Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) shows similar complication and re-revision rates compared to first-time total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Contemporary implants did not significantly alter outcomes in this study.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty
- Hip Reconstruction
Background:
- Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) is a complex procedure associated with significant complications.
- Previous studies indicate high rates of dislocation and early component loosening following CTHA.
- Contemporary implants aim to improve outcomes in revision hip arthroplasty procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the complication rates of CTHA performed with modern implants.
- To compare the outcomes of CTHA with first-time total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective matched-cohort study comparing 46 CTHA patients with 46 first-time THA revision patients.
- Mean follow-up periods of 47 months (CTHA) and 23 months (THA revision).
- Radiographic evaluation for loosening/failure and clinical assessment using the Harris Hip Score (HHS).
Main Results:
- Complications requiring re-revision occurred in 10.9% of CTHA patients versus 13.0% in the THA revision group.
- Recurrent dislocation led to re-revision in 4.3% of CTHA patients.
- Other re-revisions in the CTHA group were for component loosening and deep infection.
Conclusions:
- CTHA using contemporary revision implants demonstrated comparable dislocation rates and re-revision rates to first-time THA revision.
- The findings suggest that CTHA is a viable option when performed with modern implant technology.
Purpose:
Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) is a complication-prone procedure with high dislocation rates and early component loosening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications of CTHA performed using contemporary implants.
Methods:
Forty-six patients who had CTHA were retrospectively matched to a control group of 46 patients who had a first-time THA revision. The mean follow-up was 47 (range 6-149) and 23 (range 6-139) months for CTHA and control groups, respectively. Radiographs taken at the last follow-up visit were evaluated for signs of loosening or other modes of failure. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Harris Hip Score (HHS).
Results:
Complications occurred in five patients (10.9 %) in the CTHA group, and all required repeat revision. Two patients (4.3 %) were revised due to recurrent dislocation. The other re-revisions were done for acetabular or femoral component loosening and deep infection. In the control group, complications occurred in six patients (13.0 %), and three (6.5 %) were revised with a constrained liner due to recurrent dislocations.
Conclusions:
Dislocation rates and re-revision for CTHA were not significantly different than those of first-time THA revision when using contemporary revision implants.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care


