Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

A Common Marmoset Model of Mother-Infant Intervention for Breastfeeding Disorders in the Presence of Paternal Inhibition and Maternal Neglect
Published on: September 22, 2023
Effect of delivery season on subsequent birth interval in early 20th century in Japan
Questionnaires of birth dates of family members (13,404 families in total) were analyzed in order to examine the effects of delivery season of a baby on the subsequent birth interval. Deliveries at maternal age of 20-34 years were used. In 1921-1935, the mothers who had been delivered of a baby in August-October showed the shortest (30.62 months geometric mean) and those in February-April the longest (34.05 months) non-last intervals, with a highly significant difference among the four delivery seasons (P less than 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 5678). Although the intervals were abruptly prolonged just before the last birth, the above difference was also consistent in the last intervals. When seasonal distributions of last and non-last births were compared, last births tended to be concentrated in the summer half of a year (P less than 0.05) in 1921-1935. In 1951-1965, overall geometric mean of the interval shortened to 28.44 months, and the length of intervals did not differ appreciably according to the season of preceding delivery. Deliveries in late summer (August-October) in 1921-1935, therefore, were associated with increased risk of termination of reproduction, on one hand, but a lowered chance of prolongation of the subsequent interval, on the other hand. Possible environmental factors are discussed to explain this apparently paradoxical phenomenon.
Questionnaires of birth dates of family members (13,404 families in total) were analyzed in order to examine the effects of delivery season of a baby on the subsequent birth interval. Deliveries at maternal age of 20-34 years were used. In 1921-1935, the mothers who had been delivered of a baby in August-October showed the shortest (30.62 months geometric mean) and those in February-April the longest (34.05 months) non-last intervals, with a highly significant difference among the four delivery seasons (P less than 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test, n = 5678). Although the intervals were abruptly prolonged just before the last birth, the above difference was also consistent in the last intervals. When seasonal distributions of last and non-last births were compared, last births tended to be concentrated in the summer half of a year (P less than 0.05) in 1921-1935. In 1951-1965, overall geometric mean of the interval shortened to 28.44 months, and the length of intervals did not differ appreciably according to the season of preceding delivery. Deliveries in late summer (August-October) in 1921-1935, therefore, were associated with increased risk of termination of reproduction, on one hand, but a lowered chance of prolongation of the subsequent interval, on the other hand. Possible environmental factors are discussed to explain this apparently paradoxical phenomenon.
Related Concept Videos
Population Growth
Regression Toward the Mean
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Meiosis I
Prophase I is the most extended and complex step of meiosis I characterized by synapsis, chromosome pairing, and recombination of the homologous chromosomes. This process is facilitated by a proteinaceous structure called the...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

