Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia due to AD in clinical settings
Karim Tifratene1, Philippe Robert2, Asya Metelkina2
1From the Department of Public Health (K.T.) and CMRR de Nice (P.R.), CHU de Nice and EA Cobtek, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice; Laboratoire d'Informatique (A.M.), Signaux et Systèmes de Sophia-Antipolis (I3S), UMR 7271, UNS CNRS; Department of Public Health (C.P.), CHU de Nice; and ISPED (J.F.D.), Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U897, France. tifratene.k@chu-nice.fr.
Objectives:
To describe the positive predictive value of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the factors associated with progression in routine practice.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study was conducted from the French National Alzheimer Database. Among 446,439 patients cared for in the participating centers between January 2009 and January 2014, 45,386 (10.2%) were classified as having MCI and 23,676 had at least one follow-up visit. Annual progression rate was used to describe the progression of patients with MCI to dementia due to Alzheimer disease. Hazard ratios of dementia due to Alzheimer disease were estimated using Cox regression model.
Results:
Annual progression rate (95% confidence interval) was 13.7% person-years (py) (13.5%-13.9%) with higher rate for amnestic MCI (aMCI) (18.2% py [17.9%-18.5%]) than for nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) (9.5% py [9.3%-9.6%]). Separate regression models were performed for each MCI subtype. Higher education, older age, female sex, and lower Mini-Mental State Examination score were associated with an increased risk of progression for both subtypes. Use of anxiolytics (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.77 [0.66-0.91]) was a protective factor for aMCI whereas antidepressant drugs (1.16 [1.04-1.29]) were associated with an increased risk. For naMCI, prescriptions of antidepressants (0.85 [0.74-0.98]) and antipsychotics (0.55 [0.32-0.93]) were protective for progression.
Conclusions:
Under circumstances emulating routine clinical practice, the positive predictive value of an MCI diagnosis is in line with previous clinical studies and the external validity of the concept is strengthened. Distinguishing between aMCI and naMCI is particularly relevant.
Insights
The positive predictive value of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is confirmed in routine practice. Differentiating amnestic MCI (aMCI) from nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) is crucial for predicting progression to Alzheimer's disease.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Geriatrics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia.
- Understanding MCI progression is vital for early intervention in Alzheimer's disease.
- Routine clinical practice data offers insights into MCI diagnosis validity and progression factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the positive predictive value of MCI diagnoses in real-world clinical settings.
- To identify factors associated with the progression of MCI to dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.
- To compare progression rates between amnestic MCI (aMCI) and nonamnestic MCI (naMCI).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the French National Alzheimer Database (446,439 patients).
- Analysis of 45,386 patients diagnosed with MCI, with 23,676 having follow-up data.
- Cox regression models used to estimate hazard ratios for progression to Alzheimer's disease dementia.
Main Results:
- Overall annual progression rate for MCI was 13.7% person-years.
- Progression rate was higher for amnestic MCI (aMCI) at 18.2% compared to nonamnestic MCI (naMCI) at 9.5%.
- Factors like higher education, older age, female sex, and lower MMSE scores increased progression risk. Certain medications showed protective or risk-associated effects.
Conclusions:
- The positive predictive value of MCI is consistent with prior studies in routine clinical practice.
- The distinction between aMCI and naMCI is clinically significant for predicting Alzheimer's disease progression.
- Findings support the external validity of MCI as a diagnostic concept.
More Related Videos
06:23The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
08:43Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: August 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Parkinson's Disease: Overview
Intellectual Disability