Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026
10:45
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Observing Virtual Social Interactions
Published on: July 6, 2011
12.3K
Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews
Michael J Wood1, Karen M Douglas2
1Department of Psychology, University of Winchester Winchester, UK.
Frontiers in Psychology
|July 3, 2015
Summary
Conspiracy theories are prevalent online, offering insights into believers' psychology. Analyzing online discussions reveals conspiracism stems from disbelief in mainstream narratives, impacting psychological research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Science
- Internet Studies
Background:
- Conspiracy theories are a common online topic despite social stigma.
- Discussions offer insights into conspiracist belief systems and psychological traits.
- Understanding these dynamics is crucial for psychological research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze online discussion patterns related to conspiracy theories.
- To connect online behavior to existing psychological research on conspiracism.
- To explore the implications for future research on hard-to-reach populations.
Main Methods:
- Focused review of online comments and discussion patterns.
- Relating behavioral patterns to the psychology of conspiracy theories literature.
- Examining methodologies for studying online discourse.
Main Results:
- Conspiracist arguments often focus on disbelief in mainstream narratives.
- Online behavior patterns align with psychological characteristics of believers and disbelievers.
- The methodology provides a framework for future research.
Conclusions:
- Online discussions are a valuable resource for understanding conspiracy theories.
- The psychology of conspiracy theories is rooted in disbelief.
- Future research can leverage online data to study diverse populations.
Related Concept Videos
01:01Group Polarization
39.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.4K
01:30Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
273
Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...
273
01:17Correspondence Bias
329
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
329
01:31Confirmation Biases
8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
01:34Groupthink
50.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
50.3K
01:27Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
3.4K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
3.4K