Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

14.8K
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...
14.8K
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy01:16

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

22.1K
Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...
22.1K
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction01:07

Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction

3.0K
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can be used to determine the 3D structure of biological samples with the help of techniques such as electron microscope tomography and single-particle reconstruction. While single-particle reconstruction can examine macromolecules and macromolecular complexes in vitro conditions only, tomography permits the study of cell components or small cells in vivo.
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
3.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serotype distribution and antimicrobial resistance of pediatric Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from inpatients and outpatients at Beijing Children's Hospital.

The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases·2024
Same author

Enhancing 3D DNA Walker-Induced CRISPR/Cas12a Technology for Highly Sensitive Detection of ExomicroRNA Associated with Osteoporosis.

ACS sensors·2024
Same author

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alternative therapies in health and medicine·2024
Same author

Cell softness renders cytotoxic T lymphocytes and T leukemic cells resistant to perforin-mediated killing.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Re-rolling treatment in the fermentation process improves the taste and liquor color qualities of black tea.

Food chemistry: X·2024
Same author

Rock on the Heart: A Case of Calcifying Fibrous Tumor Arising From the Pericardium and Literature Review.

International journal of surgical pathology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip
11:23

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip

Published on: August 17, 2011

18.4K

Improved sparse reconstruction for fluorescence molecular tomography with L1/2 regularization.

Hongbo Guo1, Jingjing Yu2, Xiaowei He1

  • 1School of Information Sciences and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an, 710069, China.

Biomedical Optics Express
|July 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article introduces a new mathematical method to improve the clarity and accuracy of 3D images produced by fluorescence molecular tomography, a technology used to track disease markers in living subjects. By applying a specific type of penalty function to the reconstruction process, the researchers successfully enhanced the precision of locating and measuring fluorescent signals compared to standard techniques.

Keywords:
(100.3190) Inverse problems(170.3010) Image reconstruction techniques(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.6960) Tomographyimage reconstructionnonconvex optimizationpreclinical imagingsparse recovery

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging
16:44

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging

Published on: June 2, 2009

10.8K
Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
12:24

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip
11:23

Lensless Fluorescent Microscopy on a Chip

Published on: August 17, 2011

18.4K
Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging
16:44

Born Normalization for Fluorescence Optical Projection Tomography for Whole Heart Imaging

Published on: June 2, 2009

10.8K
Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
12:24

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical engineering and L1/2 regularization techniques
  • Medical imaging and diagnostic physics

Background:

Fluorescence molecular tomography provides a non-invasive window into biological processes occurring within living organisms. Researchers often struggle to resolve small, deep-seated targets due to the inherent scattering of light in tissues. Prior research has shown that image reconstruction remains a challenging inverse problem requiring sophisticated mathematical frameworks. That uncertainty drove the development of various regularization strategies to stabilize the resulting three-dimensional maps. Standard approaches frequently fail to maintain high spatial resolution when dealing with sparse fluorescent distributions. This gap motivated the exploration of alternative penalty functions to improve signal recovery. No prior work had resolved the limitations of conventional norms in capturing the precise boundaries of small targets. The field currently seeks more robust algorithms to support preclinical investigations.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to improve the reconstruction quality of fluorescence molecular tomography by implementing an L1/2-norm regularization method. Researchers seek to address the limitations of existing algorithms in resolving small, deep-seated targets. The motivation stems from the need for more efficient and accurate three-dimensional imaging in preclinical research settings. Conventional methods often struggle with spatial resolution and the precise quantification of fluorescent markers. This work proposes a specific mathematical transformation to solve the nonconvex optimization problem associated with the L1/2-norm. By converting this into a weighted L1-norm minimization, the authors intend to enhance the recovery of sparse signal distributions. The study addresses the challenge of maintaining image integrity despite the presence of measurement noise. Ultimately, the researchers strive to provide a more robust tool for visualizing molecular events in living subjects.

Main Methods:

Review approach involves a computational study utilizing a novel mathematical framework for image processing. The investigators implement a homotopy-based iterative reweighting algorithm to address the nonconvex nature of the penalty function. They transform the primary optimization task into a weighted L1-norm minimization problem to facilitate efficient computation. The team validates their approach through simulations conducted on a heterogeneous mouse model. Additionally, they perform in vivo experiments to confirm the practical utility of the proposed reconstruction strategy. The researchers compare their results against standard L1-norm reconstruction methods to establish performance benchmarks. They evaluate the stability of the algorithm by testing it under varying levels of measurement noise. Finally, they assess the impact of different numbers of excitation sources on the overall quality of the recovered images.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that the proposed method consistently outperforms standard L1-norm techniques in location accuracy. The researchers report significant improvements in spatial resolution for small fluorescent targets within the reconstructed volumes. Quantitative analysis of fluorescent yield shows higher precision when applying the L1/2-norm approach compared to conventional models. Simulation results confirm that the algorithm maintains performance even when subjected to different levels of measurement noise. The study also demonstrates that the method remains effective regardless of the number of excitation sources utilized during data acquisition. These findings hold true across both the heterogeneous mouse model simulations and the in vivo experimental setups. The data suggest that the nonconvex penalty function effectively recovers sparse targets that are often blurred by other algorithms. Overall, the results highlight the reliability of this mathematical framework for enhancing molecular imaging outcomes.

Conclusions:

The authors demonstrate that their proposed mathematical framework effectively enhances the quality of three-dimensional reconstructions in fluorescence molecular tomography. Synthesis and implications suggest that this approach provides superior location accuracy compared to traditional methods. The researchers indicate that their technique improves spatial resolution for small fluorescent targets in heterogeneous environments. Their findings imply that the homotopy-based iterative reweighting algorithm successfully handles the complexities of nonconvex optimization. The study highlights the quantitative benefits of this method for measuring fluorescent yield in preclinical models. The evidence suggests that the proposed strategy maintains stability across varying levels of measurement noise. The authors conclude that their approach offers a robust alternative for researchers requiring precise molecular imaging. These results provide a foundation for more reliable visualization of biological markers in future studies.

The researchers propose a homotopy-based iterative reweighting algorithm to solve the nonconvex problem. This approach transforms the L1/2-norm penalty into a weighted L1-norm minimization, allowing for more precise recovery of small fluorescent targets compared to standard L1-norm methods.

The authors utilize L1/2-norm regularization to stabilize the inverse problem. This mathematical tool acts as a penalty function, which is distinct from the L1-norm regularization used in comparative baseline models for image reconstruction.

The researchers state that the homotopy-based iterative reweighting is necessary to solve the nonconvex L1/2-norm penalized problem efficiently. This technical requirement allows the algorithm to converge on accurate solutions that standard linear methods might otherwise miss.

The study uses simulation data from a heterogeneous mouse model and in vivo experimental data. These datasets serve as the primary evidence to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm against existing reconstruction techniques.

The researchers measure location accuracy, spatial resolution, and the quantitation of fluorescent yield. These metrics demonstrate that the L1/2-norm method consistently outperforms comparative L1-norm approaches across different experimental conditions.

The authors propose that their method offers increased robustness under different levels of measurement noise and varying numbers of excitation sources. This implication suggests the technique is reliable for diverse preclinical imaging scenarios.