Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

421
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
421
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

616
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
616
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.8K
3.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.7K
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

385
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
385

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensor-based occupancy detection using neutrosophic features fusion.

Heliyon·2019
Same author

Data management for the internet of things: design primitives and solution.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2013
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.6K

Improving Localization Accuracy: Successive Measurements Error Modeling.

Najah Abu Ali1, Mervat Abu-Elkheir2

  • 1College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain 15551, Abu Dhabi. najah@uaeu.ac.ae.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that successive vehicle localization measurements are correlated. Incorporating this correlation using a Gauss-Markov model improves future vehicle position prediction accuracy.

Keywords:
Gauss–Markov modellocalizationlocation prediction

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

111

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
09:36

Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

Published on: June 4, 2020

3.6K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

111

Area of Science:

  • Vehicular networking and localization
  • Signal processing and time series analysis
  • Mobile computing and sensor networks

Background:

  • Vehicle self-localization is critical for vehicular network safety applications.
  • Current localization models often ignore correlations in successive measurement errors.
  • Accurate localization requires accounting for temporal dependencies in positioning data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between successive vehicle positioning measurements.
  • To develop a model that incorporates this correlation for improved localization.
  • To enhance the accuracy of vehicular localization algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of vehicle mobility traces to identify correlations.
  • Application of Yule Walker equations to quantify temporal dependencies.
  • Development and simulation of a first-order Gauss-Markov model for position prediction.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed significant correlation between successive localization measurements, lasting up to four minutes.
  • Demonstrated the robustness of the proposed Gauss-Markov model.
  • Showed that a simple first-order model accurately predicts future vehicle locations.

Conclusions:

  • Successive measurement correlation is a key factor in vehicular localization accuracy.
  • The Gauss-Markov model effectively captures these correlations.
  • This approach enhances positioning error modeling and prediction for algorithms like the Kalman filter.