Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance
Published on: July 19, 2017
Psychophsyiological reactivity during uncertainty and ambiguity processing in high and low worriers
Hans Kirschner1, Kevin Hilbert1, Jana Hoyer2
1Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, 01187, Dresden, Germany; Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Behavioral Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Chemnitzer Str. 46, 01187, Dresden, Germany.
Background And Objectives:
Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) has been linked to Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), but studies experimentally manipulating uncertainty have mostly failed to find differences between GAD patients and controls, possible due to a lack of distinction between uncertainty and ambiguity. This study therefore investigated reactivity to ambiguity in addition to uncertainty in high worriers (HW) and low worriers (LW). We hypothesized an interpretation bias between the groups during ambiguity tasks, while uncertainty would facilitate threat processing of subsequent aversive stimuli.
Methods:
HW (N = 23) and LW (N = 23) completed a paradigm comprising the anticipation and perception of pictures with dangerous, safe, or ambiguous content. Anticipatory cues were certain (always correct information about the following picture) or uncertain (no information). Subjective ratings, reaction times and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded.
Results:
HW rated particularly ambiguous pictures as more aversive and showed longer reaction times to all picture conditions compared to LW. SCRs were also larger in HW compared to LW, particularly during uncertain but also safe anticipation. No group differences were observed during perception of stimuli.
Limitations:
All participants were female. HW was used as subclinical phenotype of GAD.
Conclusions:
Intolerance of ambiguity seems to be related to individual differences in worry and possibly to the development of GAD. Threat-related interpretations differentiating HW and LW occurred particularly for ambiguous pictures but were not accompanied by increased autonomic arousal during the picture viewing. This disparity between subjective rating and arousal may be the result of worrying in response to intolerance of uncertainty, restraining physiological responses.
Related Concept Videos
Psychological Responses to Stress
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Hazan and Shaver's Attachment Styles
The Influence of Cognition on Affect

