Related Experiment Videos
Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients
1University of Illinois, Chicago.
Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 1, 1989
Summary
Physicians should carefully consider patient distress when discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) status. Information should be shared incrementally, respecting patient reactions to avoid psychological harm.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Patient Communication
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Discussing do not resuscitate (DNR) status can cause significant psychological distress in patients.
- Existing medical practice often mandates full disclosure of DNR status.
Observation:
- Case histories reveal patients experiencing distress when informed of their DNR status.
- Patient reactions to initial information vary, indicating a need for tailored communication.
Findings:
- Not all patients require immediate or full disclosure of their DNR status.
- Incremental information delivery, guided by patient response, is a proposed approach.
- Physician's duty includes assessing patient willingness to discuss DNR status.
Implications:
- This approach may mitigate psychological harm associated with DNR discussions.
- It emphasizes patient-centered communication in end-of-life care decisions.
- Revises the physician's duty from mandatory disclosure to assessing patient readiness.